It's highly irritating to see these pictures of bombs being launched and talks of "Stocks" soaring through the roof. We don't start these fucking wars, we end them.
Like war in Afghan and Iraq? When do you stop them, actually? You are there for like 10 years, killed more than a million people, invaded country under excuse they have weapon of mass destruction. So, when do you finish the war? When is this war, ''eye for an eye'', for 3000 people, going to end? Because you are ending them, right?
Btw, complain about your irritation to one million + people, US soldiers killed in foreign country, Iraq...
It could work, you know.
Imagine, keeping a peace with Tomahawks, F16s, and drones. Fucking hilarious. Lets just bomb the whole fucking world, until everyone is dead. Peace is guaranteed. Why waiting, it will work 100%.
Obama is just a puppet of Israel, any president who comes in to office will be the puppet of Israel, does what they say. For example, he wants Larry Summers as the next Federal Reserve chairman are you fucking kidding me that retard?
If this moron comes in then America will have another major crash worse than 2008.
Saddam Hussein was a blunder. We put him into power and he let it go to his head. Invaded Kuwait, so we killed approximately 100,000 of his soldiers to get him out of there.
maybe there weren't any WOMD's, but maybe there were
We should no longer be there in Iraq at this time, I am against our current occupation.
Why bomb the whole world when you can end the war in certain regions by decimating one specific side? If there are two sides and we destroy one side, who is there left to fight?
Calling someone disgusting for the fact that the person talks about decimating people is an infraction? What a kindergarten this is.
Did I call you disgusting? Did I say I would decimate you?
NO. I didn't.
I would decimate anyone who is harming innocent people - killing them in droves, bad people need to be decimated.
I would decimate anyone who is harming innocent people - killing them in droves, bad people need to be decimated.
I am against bombing Syria. But.... If it does happen, then so be it, at least it will stop the killings of a Government on it's own people.
I don't have a list of nations we should decimate. I would much rather prefer to stay out of the worlds business, because everyone is so ungrateful, let them see how it is without our generous donations, food, money, medicine and physical threat to keep balance in many regions.
You're attempting to twist my words around for some reason.
I would prefer if we did not bomb or invade Syria. Simply because the international community doesn't want us doing these things anymore
But when the bombs drop (and they will drop) on the Government buildings and it ends the war in Syria, it will be a good thing for the people of Syria.
the war in this country has already resulted in about 80,000-100,000 casualties. Things don't seem to be getting any better so it would indeed be best if the Government is toppled in an attempt to end this nonsense.
Very strong points made above!
Like I've stated several times throughout this thread: I do believe that we shouldn't be getting involved in Syria. Especially because we don't really know whose who and what's going on.
a problem that should be handled by the Syrians themselves, but doesn't appear to be happening because there's a government in power that refuses to give up control and will resort to any means necessary to retain that power.
I will say this though. If and when we decide to wipe out the Government or the Terrorists/Rebels whatever you want to call them, whichever side we determine to attack, it will be hopefully be for the best and end a war that's killed so many already. That's the hope anyways.
Quite the contrary Moe. You made statements that directly coincided with what I have been saying this whole time. You just worded them differently, took bits and pieces of my various responses out of context and had a field day.
In one of my very first responses I stated that due to inconclusive evidence as to who exactly the perp is behind the Chemical attacks - that the USA shouldn't pick a side.
There is no concrete evidence that shows that the Syrian Government or the Rebels of being the perps behind the chemical attack.
[...]
I personally don't think that we should get involved. We try to patrol the world and personally my tax dollars should continue to be used here at home and abroad for reasons other than war.
[...]
On another note, I do believe that we will be striking against the Syrian Government simply because the war in this country has already resulted in about 80,000-100,000 casualties. Things don't seem to be getting any better so it would indeed be best if the Government is toppled in an attempt to end this nonsense.
People seem to forget that the Syrian government has been killing it's own people 100,000+ casualties and counting.
Why bomb the whole world when you can end the war in certain regions by decimating one specific side? If there are two sides and we destroy one side, who is there left to fight? War is not fun by any means, but it is necessary.