Just so everyone knows terrorists did not used chemical attack on innocent people infact the Syria'n president did it.
I am not from Syria, but everyone knows what happened there. Terrorists used chemical weapons against civilians, and everyone knows that except USA, UK and France. If NATO attacks Syria, Russia will have two choices: to protect a very valuable friend (who buys russian weapons more than 50 years, and where Russia have access to Mediterranean Sea), or to reject to help them. If Russia decides to help them, then WWIII will start: NATO against Russia and China.
NATO should wait until UN finish the job, and get all evidence, then we can judge them.
I don't understand what USA have to do in Syria, when their allie Saudi Arabia have ridiculous laws, and no one attack them. And also Saudi Arabia funded terrorists, and what i know USA "doesn't" cooperate with the terrorists.
I don't know what the truth is but I really doubt a terrorist organization can use chemical weapons. Who are terrorists? They are small time criminals who are trained BY THE GOVERNMENT for some cunning purpose and at the end, they turn terrorists by back-f**king the government. It is highly impossible (imo) to use chemical weapons unless the government is supporting/sponsoring your actions.
Whatever the truth may be, US of A should not poke their nose in this. If required, UN should send in their troops (peacekeepers, I believe) and sort things out. US of A has no f**king business in Syria unless called for help by UN.
Just so everyone knows terrorists did not used chemical attack on innocent people infact the Syria'n president did it.
UN has a business, a business to keep peace all over the world. Isn't that the reason for its formation?
UN has a business, a business to keep peace all over the world. Isn't that the reason for its formation?
Thats a self appointed mission, it still doesn't give them any more right than a particular nation going to war with another one.
UN has a business, a business to keep peace all over the world. Isn't that the reason for its formation?
Thats a self appointed mission, it still doesn't give them any more right than a particular nation going to war with another one.
Oh is that all? Only 3 trillion?Our debt is debt that we owe to ourselves, and it's not even that much to be honest. We borrowed from within our country, externally we owe less than $3 trillion dollars.
I was referring to the UK there, and to my knowledge the situation is the similar in the US.I don't know how you can say were struggling here in the USA either. That's the most ridiculous statement in the entire world. Our citizens get free homes, food, clothes, cell-phones, utilities, unemployment, social security, medical, huge tax rebates in the form of EIC and so on. So for you to say that we are struggling is impeccable.
Leaked documents about CIA covert operations say otherwise.It's highly irritating to see these pictures of bombs being launched and talks of "Stocks" soaring through the roof. We don't start these fucking wars, we end them.
People seem to forget that during WWII Hitler was taking over the world before we stepped up to the plate.
People seem to forget that during the Yugo / Serb wars that there were over 100,000+ casualties.
People seem to forget that the Syrian government has been killing it's own people 100,000+ casualties and counting.
People seem to forget that we lost 3,000 lives in 2001 which was why we went into Iraq and Afghanistan.
People seem to forget that in Vietnam North Korea invaded the whole of South Korea.
We don't invade countries for oil and for stock purposes. We have the most abundant land on the planet, with more natural resources than ANY other country.
We don't start these fucking wars, we end them.
Without Russia, without the United States and some of the other allies, there would have been no victory.
It's highly irritating to see these pictures of bombs being launched and talks of "Stocks" soaring through the roof. We don't start these fucking wars, we end them.