I select my players according to my choices and especially "trust" (one who does not row, long-time / serious and pays). Sorry but we surely don't have the same content, yours goes to more than 4k while mine is generally HD. I offer the file for download and streaming which leaves the user the choice.
> users in these times have up to 1GB of speed in their homes, so the matter does not go on that side.
I'm sorry to tell you that the target audience does not all have fiber or some have a very limited connection. We just don't target the same traffic so please don't talk about things you don't know about.
With that, a nice day
Post automatically merged:
1 or 2 giga... You multiply that by the number of uploaders and viewers. At the end you get the number of bandwidths to use. Smaller weight does not mean bad quality (if the encoder has been set up correctly) (even if in most cases it is set up incorrectly). I think that the hosts, despite a large part of the income going to them, are not like Netflix, youtube or others who have the means to spend lavishly.
Last edited:
