Status
Not open for further replies.
so many host used skrill and they have not problems
why you dont use neteller if you dont have any payment method?

nobody will join for you,because amazon gift card is .....
 
Sorry those cannot be added. Reasons broken down as follows:


  • Skrill do not allow file sharing sites
  • PayPal - as above
  • Payza do not allow UK businesses to transfer funds to their accounts
  • Neteller - we're not currently looking to implement these as a payout method sorry.
How about adding bank transfer? :) Very comfortable payment method for EU citizens.

so many host used skrill and they have not problems

I lol'd :facepalm:
 
[/LIST]
How about adding bank transfer? :) Very comfortable payment method for EU citizens.



I lol'd :facepalm:
We'll look into this, we haven't had a demand for this payment type. At the moment it isn't something we'd look to introduce unless more users would like this? I think from memory you're the only person to ask us for this on WJ lol.

Anyone else want to see Bank Transfer?

ok,i not use your site.but i think nobody will use your site.thanks the nothing!
We have thousands of users and many many affiliates. Good luck in your ventures.
 
I'm sorry, but I gotta say a word or two on this.

From my perspective, it seems that if a filehost who suspends its users for breaking their ToS regardless of a user has a pending payout from them is OK.

I've not seen one filehost's ToS saying "we allow the distribution of copyrighted material", but the reality is that no filehost with an affiliate program would exist if it wasn't for the sharing of demanded, copyrighted material. How else would they generate revenue for themselves and their affiliates? If one only shared personal family photos and cute animal photos nobody would even be arsedto pay for a premium membership or maybe not even download that content.

So filehosts with the "we don't allow storage and/or distribution of copyrighted material" in their ToS can always just suspend their affiliates after they've generated enough revenue for the business and get away with it...

And come on, this is W(arez)Junction. It exists mainly because of discussing warez/COPYRIGHTED material and businesses. That is why all of these filehost discussion/support threads are all over the place and these businesses KNOW that their users share copyrighted material, otherwise they are very, very naive... :)

That's a question that a file host should answer, not me. Also, your last paragraph in regards to this site being "W(arez)Junction" - it maybe in the past but it is so long as I own it, W(ebmaster)Junction. Keep that in note next time.

Also, this thread is suppose to be used for HenchFile support. If you have any problem with HenchFile, then continue to post. If not, PM me in regards to replies to my posts.


Thank you very much.
 
That's a question that a file host should answer, not me. Also, your last paragraph in regards to this site being "W(arez)Junction" - it maybe in the past but it is so long as I own it, W(ebmaster)Junction. Keep that in note next time.

Also, this thread is suppose to be used for HenchFile support. If you have any problem with HenchFile, then continue to post. If not, PM me in regards to replies to my posts.


Thank you very much.

Previous post edited.

For some reason, I always thought the W stood for the beforementioned. I apologize.

We'll look into this, we haven't had a demand for this payment type. At the moment it isn't something we'd look to introduce unless more users would like this? I think from memory you're the only person to ask us for this on WJ lol.

Uploaded.net use this method of payout and it works brilliant for EU citizens, but it's not so good for non-EU citizens as an IBAN and SWIFT code are needed in order to be paid this way. Non-EU banks don't always have these...
 
cattur27.png


why has not the money but the download?
 
Ah Henchfile back again.

One of the many guys that deny you $210 payments claiming you had 2 DMCA files that earned only $0.70.

Can't believe you denied nearly everyone their payments and WJ still allows you to come back and start over.

I guess I should say welcome back then and good luck.
 
Ah Henchfile back again.

One of the many guys that deny you $210 payments claiming you had 2 DMCA files that earned only $0.70.

Can't believe you denied nearly everyone their payments and WJ still allows you to come back and start over.

I guess I should say welcome back then and good luck.

We support our users along with file hosts who require support. We will support those that have valid points and are genuine. We're going to be enforcing new rules for file hosts and members posting in their threads, wait for it.

Thanks.
 
Hopefully you implement these rules before he rips everyone off again. He was given his chance and blew it by not paying anyone with false DMCA claims.

If WJ wants to support people like this that's fine. I guess members will have no other choice than to respect that decision.
 
Ah Henchfile back again.

One of the many guys that deny you $210 payments claiming you had 2 DMCA files that earned only $0.70.

Can't believe you denied nearly everyone their payments and WJ still allows you to come back and start over.

I guess I should say welcome back then and good luck.

Hopefully you implement these rules before he rips everyone off again. He was given his chance and blew it by not paying anyone with false DMCA claims.

If WJ wants to support people like this that's fine. I guess members will have no other choice than to respect that decision.
Stooky - I am not prepared to get into another argument with you. You have never provided us with the links you claim were taken down with false DMCA notices. If you provided them I can send you the DMCA notice! We keep a record of all of them. Stop with your lies, you're as bad as jamesrocky.
 
Well the problem everyone had about not getting paid was, you claimed everyone had DMCA uploaded files in the very beginning of you launching yet you kept all those people's accounts open and earned from their files while knowing upfront like you claimed they had DMCA files. When it was time to actually pay everyone you used the excuse of them not getting paid because of DMCA claims.

You should have banned their accounts early on then if they were in fact true DMCA claims but instead you chose to accept premium membership income from their files with the plan to deny them any payments in the end. You even procrastinated claiming you were in fact paying everyone, went on vacation for a month, collected money on people's files during that whole time then denied everyone's payments.

This is not made up information, this is fact. If WJ is going to support a file host that does this and then gives them another chance to do it again, nothing I can do about it but I'm at least informing people what you did previously.

Welcome back!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top