RapidVideo - 1080p HD | Multiquality | Fast encodings | Fast Speed

Status
Not open for further replies.
what's the difference between VideoJS and JWplayer

Design and User expericere are different.

For some users VideoJS is faster and clean, for some users JWplayer is easy to use.

VideoJS is in beta, so i am still developing it and adding more features such as hotkeys.

I also find the videoJS faster and cleaner. Very good to know whether you want to use it. :)
 
Last edited:
Hi rapid. :)

Is there a problem with the converters?
It's taking so long to convert, almost 5/6 hours ...
can you see if there is any problem? It's start doing that on Saturday until now.

Best regards
 
I add a optimization method, so the encodings will be fast for new uploads today soon

New settings is added in user settings:
Slower encoding, but better quality (Recommendation: Use for regular normal uploads)
Faster encoding, but lesser quality (Recommendation: Use for batch uploads)
 
I add a optimization method, so the encodings will be fast for new uploads today soon

New settings is added in user settings:
Slower encoding, but better quality (Recommendation: Use for regular normal uploads)
Faster encoding, but lesser quality (Recommendation: Use for batch uploads)

Can you explain Slower encoding is = 720p ?
Faster encoding is = 380p?

And thanks for the help ;)
 
No, thats not correct, its same bitrate and video sizes and 3 formats, but the encoding procedure is different, when using "faster encoding", then we encode like Raptu/Bitporno, which is encoding files on our special hardware, which is 50x faster, but the produced results quality can a bit lower than the normal, im sure it will save us much load, ressources and money.
 
Last edited:
No, thats not correct, its same bitrate and video sizes and 3 formats, but the encoding procedure is different, when using "faster encoding", then we encode like Raptu/Bitporno, which is encoding files on our special hardware, which is 50x faster, but the produced results quality can a bit lower than the normal, im sure it will save us much load, ressources and money.

Ok, now i understand, :)

Thanks again for the help :)

Best regards ;)
 
I saw that you gave the VideoJS option on the panel, and it's great, is it possible to block the option of saving videos on of the player? Good job! :friends:
 
The vidoza.net remote upload support is done now, however for streamango.com, we cannot support it, as the host blocks the remote uploads to other hosts.
 
Last edited:
Hello rapidvideo? Upload remote, too slow, an exaggerated time to transfer every 1 mb .... Normal upload not working too .... Error Unknown error :wacko:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top