Image Host Script

Status
Not open for further replies.
20 comments
No need to get one coded. There are a ton out there that are always updated for glitches and vulnerabilities. Chances are you will close within a couple months, so why spend a fortune?

http://codecanyon.net/item/imgshot-image-hosting-script/2558257
http://chevereto.com/ you're new to the net if you don't know
http://sibsoft.net/xfilesharing.html need the addon
http://www.scripteen.com/scripts/scripteen-free-image-hosting-script.html easy to attack
http://imagetize.com/ never seen before. looks corny
http://imagenuke.com/ never seen before. they advertise as being cheap....always a set-off for me
http://codefuture.co.uk/projects/imagehost/ another popular one
 
I purchased ImageNuke few weeks ago and it's excellent actually. Chevereto still lack a lot of options (user registration, a good looking uploader,...). Scripteen like all scripteen's scripts is awful. I didn't try the others yet.
Anybody know where I can find some ImageNuke templates ?
 
Chevereto still lack a lot of options (user registration, a good looking uploader,...)

You can't be serious about "a good looking uploader". I mean, imagenuke URL upload looks like this:


And Chevereto remote upload looks like this:


Notice that both have multi remote upload but Chevereto can actually parse multiple URLs on that field without have to click URL upload every time. Either if you have multiple URLs on your clipboard it will fetch only the images or you click enter to add that to the remote queue.

Besides, the leak of features in Chevereto is because it has things that you normally skip in your recount like the file manager or more simple things like the image delete link, the uploader view, the full support, the theme engine (we have plenty themes out there), etc. I'm doing this on the right way and that for me is focus in the real important things like uploader, file check, file handling, etc. People who bought Chevereto one year ago got a bargain for what they pay and the same people who will buy it today will say to you the same one year from now.

Right at this very moment I'm improving the template system to let developers get really creative with JavaScript with a complete set of base methods with callbacks and all the goodies.
 
I'm not being a jackass here, you seem like a cool guy, but I could make chevereto script in a day, with the user system/admin panel etc. OOP, framework.
 
You do come off as a rather ignorant person though because you're undermining someone else's hard work with a 'I could do it if I wanted to.'

Clearly he's DONE it and is making money while you're throwing claims to the wind on an internet forum. Good job.
 
You do realize cheverto is one of the most basic paid for scripts? It's overly charged, anyone with PHP knowledge can recreate it in a day.
 
I actually have to agree with Rodney, my mate knows php and he always says it's easy to modify Cheverto..
He is just toooo lazy to do all that fancy stuff other scripts have.
 
Well, if he's dissing other people's work I have the right to do the same.

I'm not dissing other people's work I'm just saying that just that particular issue is at least debatable. So far I've just talk with the facts, I didn't start to say things like "i can code your work in one day" which in my point of view is pretty annoying because the work behind a software or script is not just the code. I don't like to talk about other people work but if I saw something totally weird like the statement that I've commented I think should share my point of view because I've created one of the software being quoted.

I know that many people can code a lot of things in one day or even less, like their own twitter and their own blog engine... But why that doesn't happen?. Code isn't all. Code is important but you have other things to deal everyday like Tech Support to your clients in every way, I even take care of some problems directly on their servers and pretty much the same day that they ask. Do you get the same in other scripts like XenForo (I feel that is overpriced)? I'm a XenForo customer and I can tell you that I feel that I've payed more for what I got, I won't enter in details because that is totally off-topic.

To summarize, if you think that a project like this is just make the code in one day and start to sell... good luck. If I've been able to inspire competitors, be the top seller and all that with a simple script (in your own words), well... It seems to me that you are missing the key factors IMHO.
 
Last edited:
Don't bother guys, Rodolfo is actually the owner of Chevereto. He's just defending its stuff. The truth is that Chevereto is very overrated. It's just that it's one of the first script that have been made out there. But there's much better now.

---------- Post added at 07:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:10 AM ----------

By the way, anyone with some ImageNuke template?
 
Of course it is overrated, as is every major popular script.

Beyond that point of popularity, their features and functionality don't matter anymore, further popularity is fueled by the popularity they already have.

I suggest you read Jesse's post, he's usually got a very good idea of which to use and which not to use.
 
No need to get one coded. There are a ton out there that are always updated for glitches and vulnerabilities. Chances are you will close within a couple months, so why spend a fortune?

http://codecanyon.net/item/imgshot-image-hosting-script/2558257
http://chevereto.com/ you're new to the net if you don't know
http://sibsoft.net/xfilesharing.html need the addon
http://www.scripteen.com/scripts/scripteen-free-image-hosting-script.html easy to attack
http://imagetize.com/ never seen before. looks corny
http://imagenuke.com/ never seen before. they advertise as being cheap....always a set-off for me
http://codefuture.co.uk/projects/imagehost/ another popular one


http://codecanyon.net/item/imgshot-image-hosting-script/2558257

I am using it, seems its bettr than CFimage script. But this will need little modification
 
My advice is Don't buy Cheverto!
It's the worst script with whom i had the opportunity to work.
Their support is horrible. Totally unfinished script, with many mistakes.
As the saying imageination Chevereto is very overrated and very expensive script.

I wasn't able to find any post in the Chevereto support of an angry customer. Chevereto is by far the image hosting script with best support and the lack of features will be issued in version 3 which will be FREE for all clients just like v4, v5 and so on.

If the Chevereto support fail you I strongly encourage you to indicate me what you need and it will be done... But it has to be posted in Chevereto I can't give you support here. I believe that Chevereto support is one of the best in this industry and this speaks for himself: http://chevereto.com/community/forums/tech-support.16/?prefix_id=2 and you may notice that I even fix some server issues totally not related with the script.

Key element here is that Chevereto has been proved by more than 800 actual clients. It won't die one day from another, it won't stop the releases, it won't be sold, etc. The numbers and the development status is solid. Can you trust in script that last update was months ago or where there are no active community?

Like I said, leave me a post in Chevereto or ask for your money back... Either way we can find a workaround.

Let me say something about Chevereto v3. The new version is already under development and it will feature a huge new set of functionalities that will mean an increase of about 10 times what the actual script can do... That is huge and is not even needed because like some you have said Chevereto is already popular and that won't increase the sales 10x. The reason behind this huge update is to keep ahead for the next years and the pricing won't be 10x more expensive because there are things in that mix like well coded functions, own core, great ui, and I want to do the best to keep the price low for what you get: A mature script builded by the user most wanted features and unique improvements.

You should be more in contact with developers and let them know what you want instead of browse for alternatives there and there. You won't get scripts that fit your needs by just browsing. Go to the devs and make your point. I've a request and suggestions forum but if you want to directly tell me something feel free to contact me a inbox[at]rodolfoberrios.com I also browse forums, blogs, etc to know what users may want but is not the same as you contact me directly... I mean, is not the same for you because you miss the oportunity to make a product fit your needs better.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top