SemiRetired
Active Member
ince the beginning of 2016..
What was your old site?
ince the beginning of 2016..
Thank you for being in touch.germany should also tier 1 like austria and switzerland. More important and bigger country than both ones
Thank you for being in touch, and sorry for the delay in response.What was your old site?
Thank you for being in touch.Your web site down !
Thank you for being in touch.Well don't get me wrong, but I don't get the numbers to add up.
You say you have ignored 70.000 DMCA takedown reports in 2016-2017.
A Google search of "DuplePlay.com" brings 2.370 hits and 2 hits in Lumen.
Vidzi.Tv (reg 2014-04) gives 3.360.000 hits on Google, and 96.505 hits in Lumdendatabase.
Vidoza.net (reg 2016-11) gives 1.650.000 hits on Google, and 35.589 hits in Lumdendatabase.
RapidVideo.com (reg 2000-11) gives 956.000 hits on Google, and 14.562 hits in Lumdendatabase.
Vodlock.co gives (reg 2015-07) gives 381.000 on Google, and 38.094 hits in Lumdendatabase.
ClipWatching.com (reg 2017-05) gives 117.000 hits on Google, and 23.256 hits in Lumdendatabase.
Your old site should have tens of thousands hits in Lumen.. unless it was the same person sending the same dmca over and over again![]()
Lumen database only keeps record of those links removed in google, not of those removed by dmca holders directly through email or site.Sorry I didn't take your claim for granted and spent 5 min factchecking your site - a site I have never heard of, but still apparently should be of some magnificent size.
Whether you are registered with Google Search Console is irrelevant (Your robots.txt is bots friendly by the way). Thing is, if you were as big as you claim, there would be a great deal of backlinks posted on third party forums. This is out of your control. If you do a google search for Vidoza.net you will see links posted at xnxx.com and similar sites. Unless all these 70.000 reported links were posted on one forum which was blocked by search engines, there should normally be significant traces of your old site out there.
CloudFlare has nothing to do with it. Your current site entred into the dnszone 2017-12. I'm talking 2016-2017 when you claimed you ignored 70.000 dmcas. Your oldsite had com-domain and even a contact form.
70k over 2 years is almost 100 dmcas each day. That's a decent number. Still there's only 2 hits in Lumen. As I said, the number don't add up for some reason.
I don't understand why are we arguing over this stupid topic. I don't have anything towards this site , and I don't think you have too.A site can block their links from being indexed by Google, even when the links are posted on a third party forum?
That was new to me. But a Google-search reveals this is not true, as I'm able to find gounlimited links posted in third party forums thru google. If you also do a Google-search for site:gounlimited.to you will see many of their videos there, so they are obviously not blocked for indexing.
And you are also wrong about Lumen.
Unfortunately, many dmca bots are not perfect and will also submit links which are not indexed by Google.
Here is an example: https://lumendatabase.org/notices/16670654. Two gounlimited links was submitted, but a look at the transparency report reveals only one of them was indexed by Google.
While I ignored you when you shared this comment,Sorry I didn't take your claim for granted and spent 5 min factchecking your site - a site I have never heard of, but still apparently should be of some magnificent size.
Whether you are registered with Google Search Console is irrelevant (Your robots.txt is bots friendly by the way). Thing is, if you were as big as you claim, there would be a great deal of backlinks posted on third party forums. This is out of your control. If you do a google search for Vidoza.net you will see links posted at xnxx.com and similar sites. Unless all these 70.000 reported links were posted on one forum which was blocked by search engines, there should normally be significant traces of your old site out there.
CloudFlare has nothing to do with it. Your current site entred into the dnszone 2017-12. I'm talking 2016-2017 when you claimed you ignored 70.000 dmcas. Your oldsite had com-domain and even a contact form.
70k over 2 years is almost 100 dmcas each day. That's a decent number. Still there's only 2 hits in Lumen. As I said, the number don't add up for some reason.
^ You added up a new comment by your self, which means that you're really interested with our service but in sick way.A site can block their links from being indexed by Google, even when the links are posted on a third party forum?
That was new to me. But a Google-search reveals this is not true, as I'm able to find gounlimited links posted in third party forums thru google. If you also do a Google-search for site:gounlimited.to you will see many of their videos there, so they are obviously not blocked for indexing.
And you are also wrong about Lumen.
Unfortunately, many dmca bots are not perfect and will also submit links which are not indexed by Google.
Here is an example: https://lumendatabase.org/notices/16670654. Two gounlimited links was submitted, but a look at the transparency report reveals only one of them was indexed by Google.
Thank you for being in touch.Unexpected overload has been occurred, we’re working to add additional resources soon. We’re really sorry for the overload that has been occurred twice this week, we will take all possible precautions to avoid this type of resources lack happening again....
Again... please fix...
i hope you be good streaming in my website
Thank you for being in touch.Hey do you create function for choose multiple video onetime to upload, not single video selection with extra upload slot, it waste lot of time. And please allow to add subtitle (.srt) to the video. Thanks
"So, please tell me how did you expect to see our websites links in Google while 100% of our users are using our embed code? And they're not allowed to share it in any forum because we don't accept this type of sharing.
And about Lumen, it will show you the links that has been removed from Google but our links aren't there in first place because we have a really straight terms on our users and check each user website and confirm his ownership of his site and how he will share our embed codes in his website to avoid abusers and insure the service can stand forever."
Should I provide you with DMCA reports I did receive from CloudFlare that isn't registered in Lumen? Because if I did, it will be obvious who is the stupid.You do not seem to understand how Lumen works, neither what SemiRetired is saying... instead you're taking offense, when all he asks for is proof, of your statements.
Facts:
-IT DOES NOT MATTER, that your site is not indexed on Google!
-IT DOES NOT MATTER, that you use socalled "safe embeds"!
Lumen is a database of DMCA reports sent to Google (applicable for all google networks of sites), every Anti-Piracy organization sends their report to numerous entities automatically, even if you're not on google or bing or other search engine, their bots can still find your links, and report them pro-actively. So that if a site ever decides to index on google (or other SE's) in the future, those links will already have been banned by earlier reports.
Since there are virtually none for the old site you stated, i can understand SemiRetired's concerns fully, and you should answer his concerns instead of trying to make him look stupid, when you are the one not understanding how things work in this regard.