you need to switch to PPS to get the referral commissioncan i have money from Referrals if their profit mode is PPD ?
We support Payza , Web-money and OKPAY . cheersstill paying with Payza, or is it so easy for you by webmoney?
Please advise more details to the issue . cheersfilevice maybe there upaloder scam us?
Chrono , we have over 60 K users with filevice , and most of our affiliates are happy with the earnings from filevice . Some our users are achieving more than 100 USD weekly from their downloads and they have been with us for over 6 months . The earning cap set for the single Ip in the last 24 hours is to prevent fraud activities and to prevent some user people from abusing our system . we understand that this functionality can affect some affiliate's earnings , but it will not impact much on your earnings if you have unique visitors to your website / files . Each file sharing site online has their own tier for the downloads from single Ip , it is not just filevice . cheersI'm sorry but until you take away the limits of gain for each ip will not use more than your service, and impossible to work with the gains that you're buying
Chrono , we have over 60 K users with filevice , and most of our affiliates are happy with the earnings from filevice . Some our users are achieving more than 100 USD weekly from their downloads and they have been with us for over 6 months . The earning cap set for the single Ip in the last 24 hours is to prevent fraud activities and to prevent some user people from abusing our system . we understand that this functionality can affect some affiliate's earnings , but it will not impact much on your earnings if you have unique visitors to your website / files . Each file sharing site online has their own tier for the downloads from single Ip , it is not just filevice . cheers
Let me correct your information , We don't have a cap on the number of the downloads Per single Ip , we have a Cap on the earnings Per single Ip . And the earning will vary from one country to another , so a single Ip can have 1 , 2 , 3 or 10 downloads until such the time the earning cap is reached , and then it will stop counting the earnings for it . and the earning count will be reset after 24 hours . I hope this will explain more how the earning from 1 Single Ip works .Earnings prevention is not fraud protection. You still never explained exactly what kind of fraud you're trying to prevent. A downloader wants 20 of an uploaders files so there must be some type of fraud going on?
Instead of not actually having any kind of fraud protection implemented and just setting limits in your mod so that uploaders don't get properly credited earnings for their downloads and labeling that as fraud protection, you should actually implement some type of real fraud protection.
Uploaders gaining various downloads from the same IP within acceptable limits shouldn't be considered as an attempt of fraud. Only giving credit for a single download is more fraudulent than actually getting downloads from a same IP.
Perhaps bumping it from only 1 download to maybe 4 or so would be more acceptable to uploaders. Considering a lot of people split their archives and naturally the same IP is going to download all pieces to get the full file.
The host will just tell you that every single one of your downloads are coming from Group D countries. Don't expect to earn what the affiliate table shows.
Not sure if i understood your question . please give more details . The table gives a clear breakdown for the earning per country . cheersok perfect, then why in the table of the program's written ppd $ 7 per thousand downloads? I speak for Italy
Hey Stooky, I just don't understand why are you so unhappy and frustrated with FileVice ?Earnings prevention is not fraud protection. You still never explained exactly what kind of fraud you're trying to prevent. A downloader wants 20 of an uploaders files so there must be some type of fraud going on?
Instead of not actually having any kind of fraud protection implemented and just setting limits in your mod so that uploaders don't get properly credited earnings for their downloads and labeling that as fraud protection, you should actually implement some type of real fraud protection.
Uploaders gaining various downloads from the same IP within acceptable limits shouldn't be considered as an attempt of fraud. Only giving credit for a single download is more fraudulent than actually getting downloads from a same IP.
Perhaps bumping it from only 1 download to maybe 4 or so would be more acceptable to uploaders. Considering a lot of people split their archives and naturally the same IP is going to download all pieces to get the full file.
We support Pyaza , OKPAY and Web-moneyfilevice continue to use your filehosting want to see, what I can do, ps would you please add the method of payment that I asked you because I Payoneer I moneybookers
Let me correct your information , We don't have a cap on the number of the downloads Per single Ip , we have a Cap on the earnings Per single Ip . And the earning will vary from one country to another , so a single Ip can have 1 , 2 , 3 or 10 downloads until such the time the earning cap is reached , and then it will stop counting the earnings for it . and the earning count will be reset after 24 hours . I hope this will explain more how the earning from 1 Single Ip works .
We have explained this functionality many times now , if you are not satisfied with our service , please feel free to join another file sharing sites , and we hope that you will find what you are looking for .No correction on my info needed. I explained it pretty thoroughly. You only credit earnings to an uploader for 1 single download per IP within 24 hours. The earning cap is reach after that 1 single download from that IP since you do not credit the uploader with any other downloads/earnings from the same IP within that 24 hour period.
This means the earnings "are" capped at 1 single download. Nothing else needs to be explained. An uploader has 50 files posted. A downloader leeches all 50 of your files within 24 hours. The uploaders gets credit and earnings for 1 single download.
I mentioned nothing about downloads being capped, I only mentioned credited downloads and earnings being capped unfairly. I'm not the only one who thinks so. This whole "we do it for fraud prevention" is a bunch of bull. Just don't pay people who are engaging in fraud and actually do pay people who are getting good legit download traffic and not just put a limit on everyone. Good uploaders can't earn because of your claims of "fraud prevention".
How about you give me an example of what kind of fraud this setup prevents? I don't have a clear vision as to what exactly you are preventing. The only thing I take from what you've been saying is that if anyone is getting downloads from the same IP then it must be some sort of fraud? Is it not possible that perhaps they just want an uploaders files which is the point of uploaders uploading things so that downloaders download them? Is it not that uploaders want repeat customers so to speak who enjoy their shared content? What is the point when the host itself says no, we think anyone who is downloading your files from the same IP is engaging in some type of fraud. Also how is it fraud when you're getting multiple downloads from the same IP? Wouldn't it only be fraud if it was coming from the uploaders IP or if the same IP was redownloading the same files over and over? I don't see any other way there could be fraud going on just because the same IP downloads a number of your files. Makes no sense.