Filemoon / Byse Discussion
- Thread starter Byse
- Start date
58 comments
Yes
ELMO7TAREF
Active Member
"Thank you for opening the discussion regarding the new hosting service. While the consistency of the rules is noted, I must express my strong objection to the following specific condition:
'A view counts as paid if at least 5% of the video is watched. For videos under 5 minutes, 90% must be watched.'
We had genuinely hoped that this system would be changed and that this particular clause would be removed. The main issue is that it effectively requires a 90% watch time for videos shorter than 5 minutes.
This requirement is highly disadvantageous, especially since the majority of content creators and publishers produce videos under this 5-minute threshold. Maintaining this strict condition is likely to be a major deterrent, and it is capable of causing the new hosting service to see very little adoption, similar to the challenges faced by the old one.
We urge you to reconsider this rule and align the paid view criteria with the standards used by most other hosting platforms, which typically focus solely on a lower percentage threshold (like the 5%). We are, however, completely fine and accepting of the second rule: 'Up to 2 views or downloads per user are counted every 24 hours.'"
'A view counts as paid if at least 5% of the video is watched. For videos under 5 minutes, 90% must be watched.'
We had genuinely hoped that this system would be changed and that this particular clause would be removed. The main issue is that it effectively requires a 90% watch time for videos shorter than 5 minutes.
This requirement is highly disadvantageous, especially since the majority of content creators and publishers produce videos under this 5-minute threshold. Maintaining this strict condition is likely to be a major deterrent, and it is capable of causing the new hosting service to see very little adoption, similar to the challenges faced by the old one.
We urge you to reconsider this rule and align the paid view criteria with the standards used by most other hosting platforms, which typically focus solely on a lower percentage threshold (like the 5%). We are, however, completely fine and accepting of the second rule: 'Up to 2 views or downloads per user are counted every 24 hours.'"
ELMO7TAREF
Active Member
"Understood. You have every right to refuse any changes.Brother, chill with the chat gptThis won't be changed.
However, I must be direct: a rule like the 90% watch time requirement for videos under 5 minutes is capable of making your new project fail, just like the old one.
Publishers stopped using the old hosting service not because of the interface or user experience, but specifically because of the rules. You are the only hosting platform among all others imposing such a restrictive condition.
If this specific rule remains, the new hosting service will inevitably meet the exact same fate as the old one. This is a critical barrier to publisher adoption."
who stopped what? i think you must stop taking drugs bud.
ELMO7TAREF
Active Member
"I approached this discussion with respect and professionalism, intending to provide constructive feedback on a critical policy that affects your platform's success.
Your response is entirely unnecessary, unprofessional, and shows a complete lack of respect for the very discussion you initiated. Opening a discussion requires you to accept and respond to our opinions maturely, not to mock or dismiss them with personal attacks.
This level of disrespect immediately reveals the unproductive mindset of the management overseeing this service.
Cocaine?
Hello,
I noticed that the new domain https://api.byse.sx/account/info?key=... returns “Page not found – The requested page doesn't exist in the renewed frontend”, while the old domain https://filemoonapi.com/api/account/info?key=... still works correctly and returns JSON data.
Could you please confirm whether the API endpoints have changed with the new domain, and provide the correct URL for accessing account information?
Thank you for your assistance.
I noticed that the new domain https://api.byse.sx/account/info?key=... returns “Page not found – The requested page doesn't exist in the renewed frontend”, while the old domain https://filemoonapi.com/api/account/info?key=... still works correctly and returns JSON data.
Could you please confirm whether the API endpoints have changed with the new domain, and provide the correct URL for accessing account information?
Thank you for your assistance.
You probably know about these already, but anyways:
Anti adblock seems to still be broken, was hoping it would be fixed in new system.
It still says 1 popunder on views 0% earnings even though you get 2.
Payment system for buying premium is not configured.
Can't see any FTP upload option.
Anti adblock seems to still be broken, was hoping it would be fixed in new system.
It still says 1 popunder on views 0% earnings even though you get 2.
Payment system for buying premium is not configured.
Can't see any FTP upload option.
Thank you for notification i have noticed we have not pointed the subdomain to correct server it will be fixed as i have updated NS records.
What do you mean with anti adblock? Last time i checked it detects the adblock correctly. The display of incorrect information will be corrected. Payment system for buying premium is disabled for now until we ensure everything else is working correctly. FTP details are on settings page.
Hello, Epiel. I suggest to change the URLs as soon as possible. I did it with all 100+ videos from my website (plus uploading 100 more videos). I thought about doing it eventually because the first notice didn't say anything about it until I received the latest email.
If you use WordPress it is easy to change all the urls with the plugin... Better Search Replace
Hmm it's strange, the first attempt to play a video works, but if I hit F5, or try to watch a second video, then the anti adblock works. If I then restart the browser, the same thing happens again, I can watch 1 video then anti-adblock kicks in. I'm using Chrome and Adblock Plus.
Manually updating 400+ links is a massive task. Had I known earlier, I definitely would have waited for the new domain.
Yes, I do use WordPress, but it's still way too much work to update them one by one.
It does not need to be individual, you only need to place the old domain that you want to change and the new domain in the plugin options... and click to start the moving process... the plugin will make a change in the data bank and change the old one for the new one.
I will try it now!
Post automatically merged:
You hare my hero, thanks a lot, it's working just thanks thanks
Last edited:
400? That is easy
Try 20,000 spread over multiple submission sites
It's going to be a nightmare time for some