FileHost.ws
Active Member
jefry, being checked as we speak.
FileHost.ws - Affiliates Earn $$$ With Our Genuine Affiliate Program ($25.00/1,000)
- Thread starter FileHost.ws
- Start date
- Status
kingofuploads
Active Member
@valentine
they accept legal porn...
they accept legal porn...
Thank you kingofuploads.
Valentine, yes.
Valentine, yes.
In fact this question was answered on the second or third page by my partner.think all this new filehosts are from the same person that have never heard off the word porn and that way never says yes ore no
Last edited:
¿Are you sure the rates are ok?, because with my first 3 downloads I get this:
The file sizes are:
1 file of 214.6 MB (I should earn $0.005 minimum)
1 file of 232.8 MB (I should earn $0.005 minimum)
1 file of 57.3 MB (I should earn $0.0025 minimum)
So the minimum total should be $0.0125 (If all downloads are from group C) and as you can see in the screnshoot I earn only $0.0075.
¿You downgrade the rates or maybe its a calculation error? 8-).
The file sizes are:
1 file of 214.6 MB (I should earn $0.005 minimum)
1 file of 232.8 MB (I should earn $0.005 minimum)
1 file of 57.3 MB (I should earn $0.0025 minimum)
So the minimum total should be $0.0125 (If all downloads are from group C) and as you can see in the screnshoot I earn only $0.0075.
¿You downgrade the rates or maybe its a calculation error? 8-).
TrumVietNam
Active Member
¿Are you sure the rates are ok?, because with my first 3 downloads I get this:
The file sizes are:
1 file of 214.6 MB (I should earn $0.005 minimum)
1 file of 232.8 MB (I should earn $0.005 minimum)
1 file of 57.3 MB (I should earn $0.0025 minimum)
So the minimum total should be $0.0125 (If all downloads are from group C) and as you can see in the screnshoot I earn only $0.0075.
¿You downgrade the rates or maybe its a calculation error? 8-).
Yes, I uploaded same files to Rapidgator and Filehost:
Filehost: 138 / $0.93
Rapidgator: 140 (1.206$)
If this is true, I would choose RapidgatorX-(
Freedesixxx
Active Member
Great service but limitation sucks.
Last edited:
FileHost.ws
Active Member
.
Rates are correct and have not been downgraded. The reason why you are seeing what you are is because the downloaded 232.8 MB file failed. Please see below full details:
You are showing 6 downloads (as mentioned above - one failed). Details below:
2012-04-21 09:05:10 0.0150 88.13....... www. ($15/1,000 rate) 214.6 MB file size
2012-04-21 08:14:55 0.0050 186.146.....www. ($5/1,000 rate) 214.6 MB file size
2012-04-21 06:18:20 0.0050 186.70...... www. ($5/1,000 rate) 214.6 MB file size
2012-04-21 09:04:02 0.0150 88.13....... www. ($15.1,000 rate) 159.2 MB file size
2012-04-21 08:08:59 0.0050 186.146.....www. ($5/1,000 rate) 159.2 MB file size
2012-04-21 05:52:02 0.0000 200.75...... www. Failed download 232.8 MB file size
2012-04-21 05:50:36 0.0025 201.184..... www. $2.50/1,000 rate) 57.3 MB file size
As you can see, your payments match what we quote in our earning table.
Based on the above few downloads, your earnings per 1,000 downloads would be $7.91.
You cannot possibly compare one on one because too many variables (for example - different geo of the downloaders accessing your files, different file sizes being accessed and so on).
__________________
Added after 10 minutes:
Please understand that giving everything for free from the outset is a recipe for disaster and one of the reasons why many file hosts die or totally change their business model. It is simply not sustainable.
As I have said repeatedly, we want to work with affiliates for the long term and not be in a situation where after x amount of time, we have to make major changes that affect the affiliates earning capabilities.
¿Are you sure the rates are ok?, because with my first 3 downloads I get this:
The file sizes are:
1 file of 214.6 MB (I should earn $0.005 minimum)
1 file of 232.8 MB (I should earn $0.005 minimum)
1 file of 57.3 MB (I should earn $0.0025 minimum)
So the minimum total should be $0.0125 (If all downloads are from group C) and as you can see in the screnshoot I earn only $0.0075.
¿You downgrade the rates or maybe its a calculation error? 8-).
Rates are correct and have not been downgraded. The reason why you are seeing what you are is because the downloaded 232.8 MB file failed. Please see below full details:
You are showing 6 downloads (as mentioned above - one failed). Details below:
2012-04-21 09:05:10 0.0150 88.13....... www. ($15/1,000 rate) 214.6 MB file size
2012-04-21 08:14:55 0.0050 186.146.....www. ($5/1,000 rate) 214.6 MB file size
2012-04-21 06:18:20 0.0050 186.70...... www. ($5/1,000 rate) 214.6 MB file size
2012-04-21 09:04:02 0.0150 88.13....... www. ($15.1,000 rate) 159.2 MB file size
2012-04-21 08:08:59 0.0050 186.146.....www. ($5/1,000 rate) 159.2 MB file size
2012-04-21 05:52:02 0.0000 200.75...... www. Failed download 232.8 MB file size
2012-04-21 05:50:36 0.0025 201.184..... www. $2.50/1,000 rate) 57.3 MB file size
As you can see, your payments match what we quote in our earning table.
Based on the above few downloads, your earnings per 1,000 downloads would be $7.91.
I will see if it is possible to add that stat in the future within the member logins however if you really need such information, simply ask me and I will provide all your logs.
TrumVietNam, I have explained the reason with CYGNUX.
You cannot possibly compare one on one because too many variables (for example - different geo of the downloaders accessing your files, different file sizes being accessed and so on).
__________________
Added after 10 minutes:
Limits are constantly being reviewed and improved if necessary. More improvements will be in place this month when new servers are acquired.
Please understand that giving everything for free from the outset is a recipe for disaster and one of the reasons why many file hosts die or totally change their business model. It is simply not sustainable.
As I have said repeatedly, we want to work with affiliates for the long term and not be in a situation where after x amount of time, we have to make major changes that affect the affiliates earning capabilities.
Last edited:
Tested a download as a free user... Got 777 kb/s B-)
Also, I like your approach to the users (not what people want, but what the hoster can offer with quality).
Let's see for how long you can hold the uploaders pressure.
Going to try you guys for a couple of weeks as a registered user, see how you handle the "market". :D
Also, I like your approach to the users (not what people want, but what the hoster can offer with quality).
Let's see for how long you can hold the uploaders pressure.
Going to try you guys for a couple of weeks as a registered user, see how you handle the "market". :D
PerMaFrOsT
Active Member
Another file-joke!
Welcome WJ :facepalm:
Welcome WJ :facepalm:
xfactormaster
Active Member
TrumVietNam, I have personally checked both the services Filehost and Rapidgator. According to me, Rapidgator has Remote uploading issues. Filehost remote upload works perfectly for me.
FileHost.ws
Active Member
We appreciate your input and pleased that you are impressed.
Thanks for trying us. Let me know if you have any questions.
I`ll take that as tongue-in-cheek being that we have literally exploded in growth over the 3 weeks since launch. Additionally, masses of positive feedback from affiliates and users of the service so now is a good time to say a big thank you to all these people.
Thank you xfactormaster.TrumVietNam, I have personally checked both the services Filehost and Rapidgator. According to me, Rapidgator has Remote uploading issues. Filehost remote upload works perfectly for me.
- Status