Do you prefer domains with "www" or without?

[Daniel]

Do you prefer domains with "www" preceding them, like

(A) http://"www.wjunction.com"
OR
(B) http://"wjunction.com"

 

[Adeel]

http://"www.wjunction.com

 

[Hillside]

I Prefer them and already got used to having sites with www.

 

[sloddl]

doesn't really matter to me...

because the most sites have a redirection so that both work.

else without www. is less to type but with www. it's good if you paste it on msn or some forum... it's recognised as a link... and you can just click on it instead of copy/paste into the url bar.

 

[SuicidalMedia]

On my site, I made www redirect to non-www. That's kinda weird, because everyone is redirecting non-www to www.

 

[Kedzi]

I prefer without

 

[zer(O)]

I prefer without

 

[-zAAz-]

http://www.wjunction.com

 

[byte_s]

I prefer with....

 

[bxflow]

I like it without. www. makes it look too long.. http://domainname.com looks better IMO

but when giving a domain in person of course most of the time people say www.

 

[Europe]

I prefer without lol

 

[broadcast]

good question without www is easier and much better for us too

not for wj only but for all sites

 

[flex202]

I prefer without

 

[Ar!yaN]

I like to see domains with "www"

without www. you need to type .com aswell

with www you just type name and then CTRL+ENTER

 

[Pirate]

I prefer the shorter one, so non-www.
I use redirecting too.

 

[RT]

Doesn't matter really, most websites work with either of them.

 

[nEw_boY]

It`s okay for .com domains that we can do ctrl+enter
I mean .com, .net .org can be one touch.

but in case of .in, .cd domains, we need to type www.blahblah.cz so it sucks.
thats why I prefer w/o

 

[dark_hunter]

Doesn't matter really, most websites work with either of them.

Even ones that have been SEOed with WWW?

 

[iMpeL]

sitename . com enough

 

[soft2050]

Option A
I like to see domains with "www"