Status
Not open for further replies.
21 comments
It should be there but rules should be made for rep abuse.

neg rep importance in some way is that when the person sells something, then the person interested in buying can see his reps history and decide what type of person seller is. If his product is not good then someone will negative rep him so another person can be saved from falling prey to his/her product.

Well this is what I think. Dunno how many agree with my point of view.
 
I feel I'm about to have a stream of negative rep coming in :p but we should have it. I made threads explaining why in the past.
 
No. I am against removing negative rep. It is good to have negative to make the users realize their mistakes and they might not repeat them again ? Why remove negative rep and have only positive rep ? Doesn't make much sense then...
 
I strongly disagree with this, negative rep should be used more often as it provides a little slap on the wrist to the wrong-doers.

Agreed and that why you were the first member who got negative rep from me.
 
get rid of it. people abuse it.

i got negative rep the other day cuz some tard thought i gave him negative rep.

... also QS cries a bunch if you give him negative rep.

plus theres a retarded error with it.. says you cant use it if youve give a bunch of positive rep to people -_-

Code:
You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later.
 
i disable it for regular members, and enable it for "ranked members" - if they have been awarded a rank, they should be mature enough to use it accordingly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top