Compare and review video hosting sites

elabcry

Active Member
333
2020
122
6,005
I will present to you my experience on video sharing sites

1- https://mixdrop.co
Good location, stable upload speed, streaming and pays fast
But the disadvantage of this site is that it does not count one view per ip in 24 hours

2- https://ninjastream.to
This site is under test, but the features of this site have good video settings and it calculates 2 views per ip in 24 hours
Views calculation has been tried and it does not cheat in calculating views and calculates 2 views per ip in 24 hours

3- http://streamtape.com
Under test it also has good video settings
However, the upload speed is slow
The site has been tested and it calculates only one view per ip in 24 hours and it does not, as the site says, it calculates 2 views per ip in 24 hours

4- http://aparat.cam
Good location, fast streaming and upload speed No more video setting but good It pays on time
The disadvantages of the site now does not support the embedding links on the site. If you put an embed link on a site and want someone watching the video, they go to the video host’s site, and this is not good for site owners
It has good prices than most sites, but is not stable at any moment, it is possible to change the prices and change the country schedule

5- https://clipwatching.com
A good site. It does not have many video settings, but it has a minimum speed in uploading files and a speed in broadcasting. It has many ads, but it has high prices.It calculates views well
It used to be stable in prices but now it changes a lot, but it has high prices
It is not suitable for website owners who want to place video links on their sites if you put an embed link on the site and wants someone to watch the video go to the video host's website and this is not good for website owners

It will be updated and additional sites or additional information will be added. Thank you
And any additional information leave a comment for discussion
 
24 comments
This host does not steal views
I have never worked with it before because I have a very large minimum payment threshold
However, it was tested in terms of player speed and calculation of views
Yes, I agree with the large minimum payout
If they somehow reduce this payout would be something great(I saw in the official thread that they don't control the payout minimum)
Post automatically merged:

I tested Netu either, good rates but a awful player and increased my bounce rate. I only recommend Netu if you have content that your user you will want to fight with the video player to watch, they even have a Captcha system, it's a very bad thing for user experience.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top