Status
Not open for further replies.
Nick, just PM admin if you want to be added, or you alredy know the answer?

--

EDIT: what have you done to get respected? reporting other people in the "scene"? im not taking any sides here, but thats gay
 
hmm well theres 3 trusted ones already wrzhost ecatel and oxywrz (who hasn't been on for 2 years :)))

but anyway hosts i would pick are:

scopehosts
lisvo
and im to tired to find the others lol :|
 
No, not me personally, and as much as I hate to say it, people like sandino should get this role as well...

As to be fair to him however annoying he is, he's still provided a good service to his clients.
 
No, not me personally, and as much as I hate to say it, people like sandino should get this role as well...

As to be fair to him however annoying he is
, he's still provided a good service to his clients.

Him and you/storming plus many others just troll the hosting forums, waiting for people to ask for new hosts/advice and put you're down services down time after time. Always putting you're link down when it's not even needed or they ask questions you just slap you're link down.

Yes Wrzhost maybe a good host in some peoples opinions but the way you lot go around trying to get clients is wrong.
 
Him and you/storming plus many others just troll the hosting forums, waiting for people to ask for new hosts/advice and put you're down services down time after time. Always putting you're link down when it's not even needed or they ask questions you just slap you're link down.

Yes Wrzhost maybe a good host in some peoples opinions but the way you lot go around trying to get clients is wrong.

I think you missed my point.
 
Nick I should get it too right ? XD


Honestly,
i wouldnt trust my money or my details to a 16 year old kid.

No offense!

Most of the hosts being presented here are owned by minors. And the ones that are owned by actual adults, are not a real company at 95% of the time...

so NO, NOBODY is trusted.
 
It's a good idea - but now that I have thought about it how would they judge who's best if they have not used our services.

Perhaps it might be more appropriate if they had a 'hosts we know' topic.

With a basic topic - brief into to the company - company's age - and some form of rating, perhaps the mod/admin could seek info from respected webmasters rather than any member otherwise you'll have a 3rd world war going on?
 
Honestly,
i wouldnt trust my money or my details to a 16 year old kid.

No offense!

Most of the hosts being presented here are owned by minors. And the ones that are owned by actual adults, are not a real company at 95% of the time...

so NO, NOBODY is trusted.
but in case U must give a poinment to that host
although they are adult, or even a teen
So, everybody is helped by your poinment dude..
and about company, i think it is not matter
as long they ara concern about theri host
and maybe, soon they will be changed to company if they give best service and can get more profit from that


It's a good idea - but now that I have thought about it how would they judge who's best if they have not used our services.

Perhaps it might be more appropriate if they had a 'hosts we know' topic.

With a basic topic - brief into to the company - company's age - and some form of rating, perhaps the mod/admin could seek info from respected webmasters rather than any member otherwise you'll have a 3rd world war going on?
about host they used
maybe, first, they must host whois records
if they used vps, just show the biling record i think...
 
Since there is a "Trusted Webmaster" rank, there should be a "Trusted Host" rank. I think I saw somebody on wJ with that rank too?

Anywho, if my opinion counts for anything, I think this is a good idea.
 
but in case U must give a poinment to that host
although they are adult, or even a teen
So, everybody is helped by your poinment dude..
and about company, i think it is not matter
as long they ara concern about theri host
and maybe, soon they will be changed to company if they give best service and can get more profit from that

I suppose I agree with that - the thing is, as soon as you declare a legal company you have to jump through A LOT of hoops trying to get everything legal, Taxes, PAYE, e.t.c.. and for a smaller company on $10 a day, it's not really worth it, and I wouldn't judge them for that as that's exactly what we did.

Once they get into the market, become established and take more money they will try to become legal - because there's a point where you might get away with transferring $200 a month into your bank, but when it gets into excess of $xx,xxx or even $x,xxx you can't really hide it.
 
Since there is a "Trusted Webmaster" rank, there should be a "Trusted Host" rank. I think I saw somebody on wJ with that rank too?

Anywho, if my opinion counts for anything, I think this is a good idea.

Thanks for the feedback - I'm hoping if enough people are willing to participate in making it work then we are get the mods to go along with it :P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top