Status
Not open for further replies.

Phamous

Active Member
2,284
2009
892
0
Who says we get a thanks button up in here? It'd be a great add-on and even though it seems useless, it'd be easier to keep the bullshit "OMG you read my mind" like replies away and etc.
 
13 comments
Thanks button would be better and iTrader with it. Also in the postbit info should be in boxes and avatar and username in the center just to make it pro looking.
 
Well we need some good Modules here
- Thanks Button
- iTrader
- Reputation System

These are recommended..
But Katz Admin should agree. :(
I don't know why they say NO to this everytime :( Like, Threads had been created ages ago for same purpose but Output was NO !
 
They say no to such things because these mods are essentially gimmicks and unprofessional, you don't need a thanks button when you can reply with somethng like "Thanks very much for this" I dont even know why warez forums have this let alone WJ as it will just decrease the amount of posts. iTrader has its flaws too since people with plenty of friends can get them to positive trade them and look trusted.
 
[offtopic]Your avatar looks like the fox is farting flames[/offtopic]

And please elaborate on that. I think the add-ons they would bring are to see who's trustworthy and respected amongst WJ webmasters and this can prevent common misconceptions and etc.
 
[offtopic]Your avatar looks like the fox is farting flames[/offtopic]

And please elaborate on that. I think the add-ons they would bring are to see who's trustworthy and respected amongst WJ webmasters and this can prevent common misconceptions and etc.
if you really are so needy of someone else to press a thank button for you or for you to have the highest "rep" in this entire forum then that makes my point.

It's just totally useless. I'd rather watch grass grow then waste my time installing such a mod on any forum.
 
There is no harm in users posting ''thank you''.

The thanks mod will not be implemented.

Thanks for the suggetion closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top