So 2 racks are more important than a customer's server? 2 racks being problematic is justifiable reason to ignore a customer's issue? A customer who pays them for the service he's not getting?
You suggesting that is just as bad as them acting that way. Please, stop pulling reasons out of thin air. Your business idea is flawed.
And the RAM not being tested is RapidSpeed's fault. They co-located at EvoSwitch. They either have their own technicians or they have EvoSwitch's technicians working on hardware issues (and hardware setup, deployment, etc) for them. If you say they can't do anything unless EvoSwitch does something, that would be foolish for a company their size to not have control of things. Again, everything you're saying is basic assumption. You don't have even the most basic idea of how things get done at DCs and colocation guys. Please, don't say stuff unless you have solid facts backing your claims up.
You suggesting that is just as bad as them acting that way. Please, stop pulling reasons out of thin air. Your business idea is flawed.
And the RAM not being tested is RapidSpeed's fault. They co-located at EvoSwitch. They either have their own technicians or they have EvoSwitch's technicians working on hardware issues (and hardware setup, deployment, etc) for them. If you say they can't do anything unless EvoSwitch does something, that would be foolish for a company their size to not have control of things. Again, everything you're saying is basic assumption. You don't have even the most basic idea of how things get done at DCs and colocation guys. Please, don't say stuff unless you have solid facts backing your claims up.