New WJ Changes

[sloddl]

ok now i see them. CTRL+F5 worked. how can i turn off cache in chrome? anyone knows? lol i always press only f5 without ctrl i thought that that's the same. :S

 

[sloddl]

ok found it.

options - under the hood - (uncheck) use DNS pre-fatching to improve page load performance.

 

[SuicidalMedia]

New members wouldnt have realised who is who mate :D

But ya i kinda agree..

Max,
When you hover over someones username it will tell you "Member" , "Administrator", "Global Moderator" , "Moderator" , "Respected Member" , "Respected Coder" or "Respected Developer". So yeah, legend isn't needed.

As Phamous said, old icons were better, at least to me.

 

[max13]

Max,
When you hover over someones username it will tell you "Member" , "Administrator", "Global Moderator" , "Moderator" , "Respected Member" , "Respected Coder" or "Respected Developer". So yeah, legend isn't needed.

As Phamous said, old icons were better, at least to me.

Didnt quite know that , Yep your right , thanks 8-)

 

[MaXiCoM]

okay dude,

TNX for Notice us

 

[Mac]

Max,
When you hover over someones username it will tell you "Member" , "Administrator", "Global Moderator" , "Moderator" , "Respected Member" , "Respected Coder" or "Respected Developer". So yeah, legend isn't needed.

Um, it's actually below their names in posts. Hovering to get a rank explanation is what they did in the legend (hovering over a username does nothing ATM, as far as I can see).

Anyways, I don't like the legend either, I think it'd be more useful if they did the whole hover to get information thing directly in the usergroup name below the username in posts which Jason is talking about.

EDIT: Oh, sorry, you're right. Hovering over a username that has a special usergroup does show the usergroup name, but it's a bit redundant when it already shows it directly below the username itself.