Latest Announcemnent
New thread

Other Need Super fast FSC / FS uploading RDP

Status
Not open for further replies.
19 comments
whats your budget mate?
if its 100 $ and over, go for rapidspeeds
if its 50-100 go for managed hybrid
if its below 50, go for knowin servers
 
get a vps from managehybrid,its for 25pounds with amazing superb fast speeds,i tried a demo
and i was getting more than 100mb/s on filesonic and around 50mb/s for fileserve,its the best i have tried till date.server was in NL
 
[SLIDE]http://lulzimg.com/i20/9254ab.png[/SLIDE]

Some of my clients got over 400MB/s UPLOAD SPEEDS.

Download SPEEDS :

[SLIDE]http://lulzimg.com/i20/13a987.png[/SLIDE]

Limited SLOTS :

ORDER URL : http://clients.buyrdp.com/cart.php?gid=9

DEMO WILL BE GIVEN ON MSN, reach me on my MSN here :

I am selling RDP here for over 6 months
And DUDE, if you are SO WORRIED, why not check this VIDEO, which i just did ESPECIALLY for you.

CLICK HERE FOR VIDEO PROOF.
 
Last edited:
intensecool said:
[SLIDE]http://i.imgur.com/ihfaJ.png[/SLIDE]
Click to expand...

171MB/s:facepalm:

Thats not possible..yet
Well even if you provide 10GBit Servers to your clients,there is no filehost atm that is capable of provideing 171MB/s on a single stream upload.And NO hdd yet is capable of delivering 171MB/S

!!!please dont post misleading images...
i have seen 700MB/s on my 2mbit home connection in Filezilla...therefore the conclusion is that they are not even burst speeds...They are not true stats.
 
Last edited:
IDC for how long you have been selling a protocol,but 171MB/S is seriously misleading stuff

171.1MB/S=1.34GBit/S :)) = NOT POSSIBLE = LOL @ INTENSECOOL!


Moreover the file = 735913984bytes = 718666 kbytes = 701mbytes

The elapsed time=4 sec, remaining time =4 sec...

Therefor total time taken=8sec

Speed=701mbyte divided by 8sec

=87mbyte/s AND NOT 171MBYTE/S = FAIL!



SO NOW WHO IS LIEING?

DO your math before posting crap
 
Last edited:
Dude, if you can not WATCH A VIDEO , i can't help.
And if you have seen the video and still say i am lying, i don't care.

Whatever you choose for youself.
 
Its not possible , max speeds for 100mbps is 12.5mb/s , for 1gbps lines is 125mb/s and 10 gbps line is 1250 /mbs and I doubt you have a 10 gbps line .
 
Last edited:
why u guys taking so much just use a demo ac and check speed if everything working fine then buy if not then dnt buy simple:D
these days hosts just capping speed if u will Buy 10Gbps Line and Upload In Mu(example) u cant get more then 500Kbps
 
There is nothing to check, math is simple, no matter what filezilla shows in speeds,

1900MB / 21 second = 90.4MB/s <--which is still fast as hell
There is no 171, or 400MB/s

There is no wrong or faked images here, it's just filezilla issue.

If you saw those numbers, it has nothing to do with actual speed, it is just a way how filezilla refresh speeds, where you, in one moment get 60MB/s and in next 171.

This is because time of refreshing is =/= 1 sec sharp, it varies from 0.5 to 1.5 sec
So, simply said you get for example 60MB/0.5 sec and in next 171/1.7 sec

This is caused by caching data from HDD into buffer, where, every time data is read from HDD, speed drops, and when it burst from buffer, speed jumps, but only because there is lag in speed measuring.

Also, no regular SATA disk can read more than 100-110MB/s
Only expensive SAS or SSD disks can go 2X-3X times of that.

Well, people learn as long as they are interested in learning.

Btw, same thing is happening with zooms uploader.

While it shows 130-180MB/s, which is impossible on 1gbit lane (even with SAS disks I have), real speed doesn't go that much, and real speed is shown in Task Manager / Networking / Bytes Sent Per Interval.

ONLY this shows you real speeds, none of other programs can show you more realistic speeds from Networking, not DUMeter, not some networking tools, because only there refresh rate is 1 sec +- 0.1 S
 
Last edited:
cvrle77 said:
There is nothing to check, math is simple, no matter what filezilla shows in speeds,

1900MB / 21 second = 90.4MB/s <--which is still fast as hell
There is no 171, or 400MB/s

There is no wrong or faked images here, it's just filezilla issue.

If you saw those numbers, it has nothing to do with actual speed, it is just a way how filezilla refresh speeds, where you, in one moment get 60MB/s and in next 171.

This is because time of refreshing is =/= 1 sec sharp, it varies from 0.5 to 1.5 sec
So, simply said you get for example 60MB/0.5 sec and in next 171/1.7 sec

This is caused by caching data from HDD into buffer, where, every time data is read from HDD, speed drops, and when it burst from buffer, speed jumps, but only because there is lag in speed measuring.

Also, no regular SATA disk can read more than 100-110MB/s
Only expensive SAS or SSD disks can go 2X-3X times of that.

Well, people learn as long as they are interested in learning.

Btw, same thing is happening with zooms uploader.

While it shows 130-180MB/s, which is impossible on 1gbit lane (even with SAS disks I have), real speed doesn't go that much, and real speed is shown in Task Manager / Networking / Bytes Sent Per Interval.
Click to expand...

i couldnt have told it better mate:)
 
upload speed to fileserve
[SLIDE]http://i.imgur.com/6rOFg.jpg[/SLIDE]

upload speed to filesonic
[SLIDE]http://i.imgur.com/wgSHf.jpg[/SLIDE]

i can also provide u a demo for upload test
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top