LOL at some of the responses in here. This is exactly why Activision gets away with repackaging a game with a new cover & shiny new map packs. They even used the same engine for this game as MW2 but with better "fps".
Activision is doing the same thing EA does: use a recycled game with refinements - which would be fine if they didn't have competition but Battlefield 3 is proving to be more than a formidable opponent.
All of these sales are irrelevent for the most part. The real party will start when they realize how many people will trade this game in.
But I digress, I'll stop being "that guy" but somebody had to...
isnt that obvious cause i mean, its built on the same engine as MW2! so older engine = lesser requirements = more audience! that is the case with me too.
i wasnt even able to play battlefield on my laptop with normal specs! but MW3 ran like a fucking dream! hence i will consider buying MW3 for multiplayer.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.