Megaupload - True Story - Spy Report

[Ar!yaN]

What ever, We lost of cash ... huh

 

[Treznax]

...or, maybe, just maybe, it's because he profited over $200,000,000 from Megaupload.

It's either that $200m, or a music service that was never launched.

I wonder. :facepalm:

It was launched.

 

[ThumperTM]

Thank you Drinkordie!!

 

[maloxi]

 

[Leeds]

good read, thanks

 

[Phozon]

...or, maybe, just maybe, it's because he profited over $200,000,000 from Megaupload.

It's either that $200m, or a music service that was never launched.

I wonder. :facepalm:

Very true, But he was aiming to give back to them more than anything the pirates cost them in the first place.

I think the real story is that the music groups got scared and decided to gang up on him using his past as a golden ticket to win.

 

[Drinkordie]

Very true, But he was aiming to give back to them more than anything the pirates cost them in the first place.

I think the real story is that the music groups got scared and decided to gang up on him using his past as a golden ticket to win.

Exactly (y) Those dinosaurs - labels - are true enemy of artists ... [hmmm]

 

[UltimA]

Kim was a shady individual with a history of very unethical business practices. He'd throw anybody under the bus to get a "one up".

Purchasing a failing companies shares, announcing a 50m EUR investment, only to get the shares to jump so he could sell without investing anything, is a perfect example.

Megaupload earned millions of dollars in profit per month, and as such, he produced whatever he could (such as this "Megabox") to try and claim he wasn't profiting from warez; paying Swizz Beatz to be CEO wasn't a move to "be generous", it was to keep his bankroll flowing.

It was his greed and flaunting of wealth that led to his downfall.

When you pull out your dick and start waving it around expect to get cold.

 

[Drinkordie]

Kim was a shady individual with a history of very unethical business practices. He'd throw anybody under the bus to get a "one up".

Purchasing a failing companies shares, announcing a 50m EUR investment, only to get the shares to jump so he could sell without investing anything, is a perfect example.

Megaupload earned millions of dollars in profit per month, and as such, he produced whatever he could (such as this "Megabox") to try and claim he wasn't profiting from warez; paying Swizz Beatz to be CEO wasn't a move to "be generous", it was to keep his bankroll flowing.

It was his greed and flaunting of wealth that led to his downfall.

When you pull out your dick and start waving it around expect to get cold.

You're doing a little off topic here, everyone knows that he made a lot of money thx to warez but this whole situation with closing MU was a bit suspicious, - you remember Rapidshare case ? Back in time they were no.1 ; )

to try and claim he wasn't profiting from warez ...

When you pull out your dick and start waving it around expect to get cold.

It sounds like a demagogue. :whistle:

 

[Putin]

I believe this is true indeed :-\

I'm interested in Megakey, how did it actually generate 99cent per free download from adware... adware requires 1000 _unique_ impressions for 99 cents or 3-6 clicks... and not many people click that often...

 

[Myth?]

Lets just hope we can find out the truth sooner or later. That this doesnt go down as an unsolved mystery.

 

[GoldenKite]

people should bycot Universal music group, stop buying the songs and stop going to cinemas playing their movies!!! simple as that!

 

[Putin]

people should bycot Universal music group, stop buying the songs and stop going to cinemas playing their movies!!! simple as that!

What good will that do? They'll blame the decrease in sales on piracy ^_^

Anyway, I couldn't boycott even if I wanted too. I listen to indi music/metal labels + don't watch movies. ^_^

 

[Mutikasa]

i read this. it may be true may be not.
who knows

 

[Jacob_Thompson]

Hey. Thanks for sharing worthy information. I came to know quite a lot after reading this.