Hosting Section Idea

[DLow]

Perfect idea.

Basically to make members aware of the nulled content, if they decide to go ahead and get hosting then that would be their choice.

I second this idea, Since i did make the forum thread B-)

 

[Zeokat]

Good idea.
At least if someone wants to scam they have to pay a whmcs license.

 

[Ephemeraboy]

The problem is, I CAN AFFORD A LICENSE, but why should I give $15/mo to WHMCS?
I can buy a domain with that money :P

The reason I don't have a license is that I don't give a fuck. And I give a FUCK about my clients but I've secured my WHMCS...

agree
i really confused with this problem
on 1st post
the problem is attitude of hoster
not the WHCMS...
so, instead of validating whcms
why don't WJ team
validated new host company
based on their reliable information.
and so far
offshore allows nulled script
this is like a hypocritical drama..

and
i agree with localhost
using itarder is better

the main problem is hoster responsibility, nt WHCMS

 

[ihawk]

it would be much more better if we got some clean stuff.

I support the disclaimer idea

 

[el_jentel1]

Alright, we'll update the rules soon, after that if a hosting thread is not mentioning details about licenses (legit/nulled) please report it and/or post in the thread requesting that information.