Latest Announcemnent
New thread

Guys, help me make my choice

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

derrenbrown

Active Member
33
2011
0
0
Hi guys,

I noticed that lots of hosting plans from different sellers are provided here, and lots of people seem to use rapidleech / sborg downloading and uploading, hopefully you guys can help me out.

My question is, if you consider speed as the only factor, in which way would you get the fastest speed?

1. Simply use built-in remote upload features, for example, using premium accounts uploading files to filesonic from wupload or fileserve etc.

2. Use 1Gbps or 2Gbps servers, rapidleech or sborg, for example, download files to local disk and then upload them to filehosts.

It seems to me that built-in remote upload would be faster, as you don't need the middle server, but lots of people are buying vps or dedicated server to do the job, so I could be wrong.

Anyway, anybody into this business long enough should know the answer, would you please give your opinion?

Thanks a lot
 
6 comments
0ccul7 said:
Sure there is, a File host will max give you 400 to max 500 kb/s but with a server of yours, you can push it to more
Click to expand...

What do you mean by push it to more? Downloading files simultaneously on your server? If a file host only gives a 400 to 500 max, wouldn't it be taking more time downloading and re-uploading a file on dedicated servers?

I don't quite understand, please fill me in mate. Thanks
 
With a 1GBPS VPS you will be able to download at the speed of roughly 2MB/s less or more where as you may get less than 25% in remote upload and same for upload, I think

In your own server you may set up sborg which can auto post and also give output with screenshots and bbcodes where as remote upload will not give you that

Hope this helped
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top