FileSonic.com – $17PPS, $35/1000 Downloads – Make Your Life Easier - Go with FS!
- Thread starter FileSonic Hish
- Start date
-
- Tags
- filesonic
- Status
damtrongtim
Active Member
@Hish, i try to login my account but i got this error "502 Bad gateway" and can't access to account, have you fix something? or i do something wrong mate?
Hello cvrle77
I read what you wrote on page 367. Your first question is not clear thats why hish might not have replied there.
What you meant by - "uploading speed was always like that" , are you complaining or praising ?
Regarding API for uploaders , its still in the pipeline and will take time to implement.
Regards
Cvrle77 is right, we both have a server located in WDC on Softlayer's network (which is one of the best networks on the world) and getting really crappy speeds during peak hours, and that's because IPTransit and not Filesonic, but you, as customer of Webazilla could forward that to them!
199.80.55.206 via FTP (Speed right now is ~290Kb/s, after peak hours it's up to 300Mbps)
I'd rather not mention tracerouting to EU servers from WDC. It's unbelievable that it goes from WDC to Ash and then back to Dallas (IPtransit core) and directly to Amsterdam (IPtransit)...
I sent them mail, but they just simply ignoring it. Softlayer told me that they will not reroute the traffic because of this, so it's up to you guys. And I believe that people in Dallas getting much better speeds to EU than we on the east coast.
199.80.55.206 via FTP (Speed right now is ~290Kb/s, after peak hours it's up to 300Mbps)
I'd rather not mention tracerouting to EU servers from WDC. It's unbelievable that it goes from WDC to Ash and then back to Dallas (IPtransit core) and directly to Amsterdam (IPtransit)...
Code:
traceroute to 78.140.171.5 (78.140.171.5), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 10.26.55.132 (10.26.55.132) 0.041 ms 0.013 ms 0.012 ms
2 po101.cer01.sr01.wdc01.networklayer.com (208.43.118.133) 19.102 ms 19.125 ms 19.155 ms
3 po2.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com (173.192.18.196) 19.547 ms 19.620 ms 19.647 ms
4 peering.ash.us.iptransit.com (206.223.115.75) 45.888 ms 45.879 ms 46.063 ms
5 te2-4.dfw.us.iptransit.com (204.26.60.49) 181.053 ms 181.084 ms 181.165 ms
6 204.26.61.13 (204.26.61.13) 168.068 ms 168.274 ms 168.597 ms
7 te1-1.ams-evo.nl.iptransit.com (204.26.60.85) 168.725 ms 170.296 ms 170.607 ms
8 204.26.60.90 (204.26.60.90) 169.529 ms 204.26.61.10 (204.26.61.10) 169.854 ms te3-2.ams-evo.nl.iptransit.com (204.26.60.98) 169.505 ms
9 204.26.61.106 (204.26.61.106) 171.016 ms 204.26.61.118 (204.26.61.118) 173.944 ms 204.26.61.78 (204.26.61.78) 172.317 ms
10 78.140.169.13 (78.140.169.13) 174.074 ms 182.321 ms 78.140.169.9 (78.140.169.9) 182.331 ms
11 78.140.171.5 (78.140.171.5) 182.467 ms 182.472 ms 172.619 msI sent them mail, but they just simply ignoring it. Softlayer told me that they will not reroute the traffic because of this, so it's up to you guys. And I believe that people in Dallas getting much better speeds to EU than we on the east coast.
@ reverse: This was my original question:
@cober
I've never, not even once, using z-o-o-m's app, which uses web interface, got speeds over 1.5MB/s which is like 12mbits, no idea where did you found 300mbits, which is equal to 35-36MB/s
Same thing when I use website for uploading. So, it's nothing to do with their app.
And I don't use FTP, because I can't have link back that way
Also, I had server in NL, just for a short amount of time I had those awesome speeds, and they were cutted off...
We are talking about Softlayer Network.... the one that is among best in the world?
@cober
I've never, not even once, using z-o-o-m's app, which uses web interface, got speeds over 1.5MB/s which is like 12mbits, no idea where did you found 300mbits, which is equal to 35-36MB/s
Same thing when I use website for uploading. So, it's nothing to do with their app.
And I don't use FTP, because I can't have link back that way
Also, I had server in NL, just for a short amount of time I had those awesome speeds, and they were cutted off...
We are talking about Softlayer Network.... the one that is among best in the world?
Last edited:
scoopcelebrity
Active Member
I also can't upload nothing today!!!
I get this error:
504 Gateway Time-out
The server didn't respond in time.
What is wrong???
Am sorry to have to say that I have had nothing but trouble with Filesonic since they moved from sharingmatrix. Customer services are second to nothing and by that I mean they are next to nothing. I have reported download speed issues and Download Manager connectivity issues and I get the same answers everytime which, are cut and paste from a standard answer form. I have even emailed asking if they could please send me some sort of reply that was not a standard answer and tried to get some interaction with them but, nothing!
My problems were and still are, download speeds are poor, only achieving 30 to 40KBps and cannot get Download manager to download files.
The standard answer is my downlaod manager requires updating and I need to clear down my internet cookies and cache. I have had that reply at least 8 times now.
I am sorry to say once my subscription expires I wont be renewing and I wont be recommending anyone to use Filesonic either.
My problems were and still are, download speeds are poor, only achieving 30 to 40KBps and cannot get Download manager to download files.
The standard answer is my downlaod manager requires updating and I need to clear down my internet cookies and cache. I have had that reply at least 8 times now.
I am sorry to say once my subscription expires I wont be renewing and I wont be recommending anyone to use Filesonic either.
I don't use web upload via RL because it's 50%-50% to get EU servers, so I'm avoiding that. Instead of that I'm using gftp (multithreaded ftp) which use a lot connection and because of that I am getting 35MB/s each morning, but during last days the FTP isn't so stable as it was, it doesn't matter how fast you upload to their servers but how long I have to wait for my file to appear in file manager. I think that Softlayer has nothing to do with that, but IPtransit! Their core servers seems to be overloaded and that's it why we don't get blazing speeds.
Traceroute from Dallas, 1Gbps, Softlayer.
Code:
1 cer01.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.128) [MPLS: Label 31 Exp 0] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
2 po1.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.201) [MPLS: Label 10751 Exp 0] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
3 ae6.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com (173.192.18.210) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
4 peering.dfw.us.iptransit.com (206.223.118.25) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
5 204.26.60.110 [AS IPTRANSIT] [MPLS: Label 25 Exp 0] 260 msec 240 msec
204.26.60.122 [AS IPTRANSIT] [MPLS: Label 25 Exp 0] 136 msec
6 204.26.61.13 [AS IPTRANSIT] [MPLS: Label 150 Exp 0] 140 msec 212 msec 204 msec
7 te7-2.ams-tc2.nl.iptransit.com (204.26.60.197) [AS IPTRANSIT] [MPLS: Label 49 Exp 0] 204 msec 172 msec 128 msec
8 204.26.62.158 [AS IPTRANSIT] 200 msec 260 msec 144 msec
9 204.26.61.106 [AS IPTRANSIT] 144 msec
204.26.61.86 [AS IPTRANSIT] 136 msec
204.26.61.122 [AS IPTRANSIT] 132 msec
10 78.140.169.13 [AS WEBAZILLA] 136 msec 140 msec
78.140.169.9 [AS WEBAZILLA] 140 msec
11 78.140.171.5 [AS WEBAZILLA] 128 msec 128 msec 132 msechello cvrle77
Yes , now i understand your problem.
It happens to me too but occasionally, and the thing is i remote upload from rapidshare.
I saw my rs account logs and found out my account is being accessed from NL and USA at the time time , this means some of my files in the whole batch are routed from different servers located at different locations at the same time.
Thats why some of my files gets uploaded gets fast but other takes time.
Now that i have understand the issue, i will explain hish on your behalf.
Regards
petertouch
Active Member
All those new filehosters are victims of their quick success and reward programs abused by greedy filetraders. Result - poor dl speeds...
Registered User
Active Member
Hey Hish .. i sent u a PM abt this issue .. plz reply
- Status