Fileom is whoisguard so you can't whois them. panama location belongs to Whoisguard not fileom.
Ah, ok.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using Tapatalk 2
Fileom is whoisguard so you can't whois them. panama location belongs to Whoisguard not fileom.
Fileom is whoisguard so you can't whois them. panama location belongs to Whoisguard not fileom.
Fileom is whoisguard so you can't whois them. panama location belongs to Whoisguard not fileom.
No, panama is where fileom domain got registered. Try to whois the server IP and find out the real location of fileom.
Server IP: 37.48.82.71
I am going to continue to use fileom as my users love it and for me that is as important as making sales.
I think if you care about your downloaders and not just yourself then in the long run it will be a lot better for you
I just hope that fileom can add a new payment gateway and that all future payments are made on time.
I can wait for the money that is owed to me, if I dont get it so be it as long as things are good for the future then I will be happy and so will my downloaders.
Xerver.co IS NOT FileOM, they're trustworthy, honest, reliable, and stable.
I remember how filegrasper owned some image hosts and after the acquisition by new owners some year ago - supposedly big fish with big money, suddenly ceased to be solvent.
Filegrasper completely cut off himself from the new owners, claiming that he has nothing to do with them and set up new file host. Now the situation looks very similar.
Since then, I know that this man is not trustworthy.
Xerver.co IS NOT FileOM, they're trustworthy, honest, reliable, and stable.
If you're a big content holder with management on your peck and call, I suppose that's accurate. Normal folk, though, enjoyed unexplained file deletions & void of contact.