Offshore Hosting Providers: Some offshore hosting services operate outside of the jurisdiction of the DMCA, which means they might not adhere to the same rules as U.S.-based hosts. Examples include:
Koddos: Known for offshore hosting, they may allow more lenient content policies.
Shinjiru: Offers a strong emphasis on privacy and security while operating offshore.
Bulletproof Hosting: Some providers advertise themselves as "bulletproof" hosts that will not adhere to take-down requests, including DMCA notices:
The Onion Router (Tor): Using Tor, you can host content anonymously, but this requires technical knowledge and isn't a traditional hosting solution.
VPS Hosting: Virtual Private Server (VPS) providers that are offshore may provide more freedom regarding the hosting of certain types of content. Examples include:
Netherlands-based providers are often more lenient toward free speech and might allow DMCA-infringing content.
Content Delivery Networks (CDNs): Some specialized CDNs may host content and not respond to DMCA notices. However, this is also risky and may lead to service termination:
Cloudflare: While not a hosting provider, some users have managed to distribute content using Cloudflare, but they also abide by DMCA.
Self-Hosting: If you're technically savvy, self-hosting at home or in a private data center can avoid the limitations imposed by hosting providers. However, this comes with its own risks and legal challenges.
i really wish people would embrace the TOR network. you see all these sites like fmovies and aniwave going offline. If they were on the TOR network they wouldnt be going offline at all.
i also dont know if the automated DMCA bots that search for video links work on the TOR network, so the links that get posted wouldnt get marked as quickly or if at all for DMCA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.