Latest Announcemnent
New thread

DDL - Accepted File Hosts - outdated rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Drinkordie

Active Member
2,167
2010
660
0
I think that DDL global rules about Accepted File Hosts are bit "outdated" and need to be changed because for example nobody use now hotfile (for obvious reasons) or storage.to (btw this host dosent exist anymore its kickload now XD ) ...

What do you think about that?
 
10 comments
Why don't you say it like this instead so everyone will understand:

"Add Filesonic and Fileserve as primary hosts."

My opinion: Hell no! Fileserve and Filesonic have WORST premium service. I download at FULL speed from MU as FREE USER, while I can't even max out as Premium on both FS and FSC? Fuck that.

Rapidshare, Megaupload and Mediafire ftw.
 
Smith said:
Why don't you say it like this instead so everyone will understand:

"Add Filesonic and Fileserve as primary hosts."

My opinion: Hell no! Fileserve and Filesonic have WORST premium service. I download at FULL speed from MU as FREE USER, while I can't even max out as Premium on both FS and FSC? Fuck that.

Rapidshare, Megaupload and Mediafire ftw.
Click to expand...


Man I prefer dl from Wupload or uploaded, I dosent like Fileserve, but HF in Primary host its a confusing thing for me ... O.o
 
Ok, wupload is good but that's because it's new. wupload = filesonic, same guys administrating so just wait and see how they will do in few months.
 
i think rapidshare is best coz with collector acc you can upload greater than 1gb file with remote upload,
they say 200mb per link but with remote upload you can upload even a file more than 1gb for free :D

so they are Best
MU/MF sucks coz free user not able to remote upload :D
 
As there os no 1 site stating what filehosts "must" be used, does it make any difference who uploads to which filehosts?

Personally I say NO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top