Capitalism: An economic system based on a free market, open competition, profit motive and private ownership of the means of production. Capitalism encourages private investment and business, compared to a government-controlled economy. Investors in these private companies (i.e. shareholders) also own the firms and are known as capitalists. Workers can earn a wage that they have earned and quality for. Individuals can achieve great wealth if so desired.
Communism: Economic and social system in which all (or nearly all) property and resources are collectively owned by a classless society and not by individual citizens.
Socialism: Socialism is an economic concept that advocates public ownership of all resources. The production and distribution of resources with a society are then controlled by members of that society collectively or by the government that represents that society. Goods are produced and distributed based on need rather than on market forces such as profitability, price and consumers' purchasing power. In a socialist economy, workers contribute to society based on their ability and receive according to their needs, rather than being paid wages and using that money to purchase what they want. Private possessions are limited to personal-use items such as clothes, and there is no need or ability for individuals to accumulate wealth, so there is equality among the people.
In a lot of our discussions in this debate zone we are inadvertently talking about one of these. People are upset because they want more and feel treated unfairly. Some of us throw up charts and graphs to show wealth gaps and so forth. So what is the best option? For me the answer is and always has been Capitalism. Here in America we also use some Socialism as well to help those who are lesser than us. It allows me to work hard for myself, not rely on anyone else and if I feel like helping someone out that is my own choice. My taxes go to systems that help people who are lesser, so it's not like it's all for self gain here. But the other two in my opinion are extreme and just simply do not work if the entire economic system is based off of them.
Communism: Economic and social system in which all (or nearly all) property and resources are collectively owned by a classless society and not by individual citizens.
Socialism: Socialism is an economic concept that advocates public ownership of all resources. The production and distribution of resources with a society are then controlled by members of that society collectively or by the government that represents that society. Goods are produced and distributed based on need rather than on market forces such as profitability, price and consumers' purchasing power. In a socialist economy, workers contribute to society based on their ability and receive according to their needs, rather than being paid wages and using that money to purchase what they want. Private possessions are limited to personal-use items such as clothes, and there is no need or ability for individuals to accumulate wealth, so there is equality among the people.
In a lot of our discussions in this debate zone we are inadvertently talking about one of these. People are upset because they want more and feel treated unfairly. Some of us throw up charts and graphs to show wealth gaps and so forth. So what is the best option? For me the answer is and always has been Capitalism. Here in America we also use some Socialism as well to help those who are lesser than us. It allows me to work hard for myself, not rely on anyone else and if I feel like helping someone out that is my own choice. My taxes go to systems that help people who are lesser, so it's not like it's all for self gain here. But the other two in my opinion are extreme and just simply do not work if the entire economic system is based off of them.
Last edited: