Is this some boasting topic?
The auto poster you use must be crap.
My private mod flagged your account as using a autoposter 632 times
Could you code this mod for vbulletin 3.8.x by any chance?
JGM.
As certain things become "commonplace" they get implemented into applications pretty quickly to overcome them. Whilst gavo's protection isnt implemented in my autoposter yet, as i said, if more people do it, then its only a matter of time. Bottom line is you cannot stop it. It takes more time for the administrator to implement than it does for me to overcome.Could you code this mod for vbulletin 3.8.x by any chance?
As certain things become "commonplace" they get implemented into applications pretty quickly to overcome them. Whilst gavo's protection isnt implemented in my autoposter yet, as i said, if more people do it, then its only a matter of time. Bottom line is you cannot stop it. It takes more time for the administrator to implement than it does for me to overcome.
Having said that, I don't condone spam or abuse. I did at one point refuse to add a reply feature specifically because people would use it to bump topics and wreck forums. Other applications got released that had the ability to reply and thus I was forced to add it myself. I could enforce "anti-abuse" routines, but again, other applications wont, and thus gain popularity as a result.
The best thing to do is create a public list of IP addresses that abuse these applications, or even better, take note of something IPB implemented and maybe a good coder can create something similar:
IPB has an anti-spam routine that, upon sign-up, checks email addresses, usernames, etc.. with a database. Each entry in the database has a "level" assigned to it based on the amount of times that particular entry has been "reported". The user is then either auto-banned or if "semi-bad" required to be validated by an administrator.
It removes the wide majority of spammers. Nothing is perfect, but it does seem to be the best way to apply an anti-spam system.
The creator of this setup could charge as little as $1 a month to allow access to its anti-spam database, and everyone is a winner. Thousands of people would most likely make use of it, and not only the warez scene.
I guess there are varying levels of it. I think the best way to determine whether it is spam or not is to use a specific definition (Wikipedia >_<)In you are eyes what does it take fir someone with an autoposter to be considered a spammer by you? Fake dvdrips? 100 of posts in 3 minutes?
Spam (electronic), unsolicited or undesired electronic messages
In short he renamed login.php to another file name eg sign-in.php and then in the template and script changed the login link to the new file. That means that when autoposters try to login it doesn't work as they don't know where the real login link is.
The thing is this requires quiet a lot of template changes which you can't really do in a plugin or mod but it's pretty easy to do yourself as your just changing the links in the template and renaming a file. Have a go on a test site. You'll never know if you don't try.
For the old login file which is now no longer used to login he just coded a script to record the usernames to see who logs in the most. This isn't really needed to stop the autoposters.
As for the original topic this used to happen quiet a bit a while ago. I'm surprised it's not happening as much. I suppose sources and release blogs are becoming more reliable.
Reach 1000's of webmasters, hosts & affiliates. Banner & sponsored-thread slots available.
Contact us