Are you math smart!?

[Roy.]

are you certain 39690 is the answer?

indeed if its how I read it (7^2) x 10 x (3^4) = 39690

Nerds <_<

This is primary school level maths. Dear God, the idiocy shines through with your response.

 

[ajinkya9]

^^
I'm assuming you're from India.(so Am I)
That's why you are finding it so easy.

 

[Roy.]

^^
I'm assuming you're from India.(so Am I)
That's why you are finding it so easy.

No lol, UK. This stuff isn't hard, maybe because OP is young and it's the first time he is tackling it or purely because of the bad formatting.

 

[Invisian]

12. (2^3) x (3^4) x (7^2)

13. 5 x 6 x (7^2) x (8^3)

14. 0 (obviously, if you don't get that it's because anything multiplied by 0 is 0)

15. Not sure what you are asking me to do, answer is 39690 but "Simplify" needs context with maths.

Order of Operations:
BODMAS
Brackets Of Division Multiplication Addition Subtraction
(That's what I was taught, maybe different in different countries)

16. Cannot be done as you cannot divide by 0

17. 84

18. 11-(9/3) = 11-3 = 8

I got the same answers exept 16, i went on solving it.
[SLIDE]http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m550/Invisian/2011-04-26162706.jpg[/SLIDE]

 

[Invisian]

To be hoesnt I had to bing this stuff.

 

[Roy.]

Lol 16 is undefined as it's asking you to divide by 0, impossible a faire ! And I can't read wtf is on your hand and what you are trying to do.

 

[HydroR]

12. (2^3) x (3^4) x (7^2)

Its asking for exponential notation, ^ that is not? ^

 

[DeMoN100]

Im just stimulating minds. I was just never good at math. I always focused on other things.

 

[Roy.]

Its asking for exponential notation, ^ that is not? ^

It is, numbers to powers can be classed as exponential notation. Unless you mean using the exponential function which is what I initally thought, then I seen the rest of the questions then I followed the format.

 

[BlazZe.]

u want that We to do your homeWork ???

 

[HydroR]

It is, numbers to powers can be classed as exponential notation. Unless you mean using the exponential function which is what I initally thought, then I seen the rest of the questions then I followed the format.

So would the '2x107' format be an acceptable way of answering aswell?

note: example

 

[DeMoN100]

I did it already, im just posting up screenshots to see if my answers are the same as anyone elses.

 

[ajinkya9]

Which Grade are you in BTW ?

 

[Invisian]

Lol 16 is undefined as it's asking you to divide by 0, impossible a faire ! And I can't read wtf is on your hand and what you are trying to do.

Don't read, some are direct answers.

 

[SJshah]

This is freaking easy, you dont have to be a genious to do this.

If you find this hard, check out intergration of logarithms. >_>

 

[DeMoN100]

So everyone, what did you get for 15?

 

[Roy.]

This is freaking easy, you dont have to be a genious to do this.

If you find this hard, check out intergration of logarithms. >_>

'Integration' of logarithms isn't hard. )

 

[geokasur]

I would but there is no original way to repair it because that's how it was originally sent to me.

 

[-zAAz-]

No, Not really.

 

[DeMoN100]