100tb.com VS Rapidspeeds

[viruz99]

Hey guys , which one of those 2 have better network .

Rapidspeeds ( NL ) - Leaseweb / Evoswitch

100tb.com ( USA ) - Softlayer

This may sound strange but it seems i get better upload/download speeds from Fileserve/Filesonic using Rapidspeeds servers though its located in Europe .

Anyone else noticed that ?

 

[snkr007]

Rapidspeeds FTW

 

[Dom]

Ok Well ,

100TB.COM is Softlayer Network which is known to quiet good

EvoSwitch is ok . But not any Softlayer

So 100TB FTW!

 

[haseeb221093]

imo RS have got better uploading speeds to fs/fso/rs as well as torrents

 

[thefboo]

Rapidspeeds.....

 

[Robin H]

RapidSpeeds.

 

[iHate]

100TB is the best as its on the SoftLayer network
which is one of the best in the world.

 

[viruz99]

Nice

I'l' wait for my 100tb server to end then get one from Rapidspeeds :::::

 

[factor]

On Rapidspeeds.com which do you think are the competitors to Ember($201.15) , Flame($282.15) or Inferno($376.65) of 100TB.com?

 

[iHate]

If you compare Price/Specs 100TB is better.

 

[viruz99]

Bah get the 1st one - the 150 euro one

Yeah RS is kind of expensive , specially their USA servers -

I was talking about their NL servers though - its funny to get better speeds from Fileserve + FIlesonic which is located in the US same as 100tb.com

 

[Dom]

iHate has got the right mind set. There is no way RapidSpeeds con compete with 100TB / MidPhase / SoftLayer just the shear experience and quality they have is A+

 

[factor]

Anyone know what is the datacenter of rapidspeeds US server? Thanks.

Edit: I found it. http://rapidspeeds.com/index.php?a=aboutus
It's PowerLoft (Virginia, USA) . But I never heard of it.

 

[snkr007]

@factor : PowerLoft

 

[viruz99]

Stick with the NL ones

 

[sam00168]

Softlayer is better Go with 100tb.com 5min`s response around the clock.