Who's More popular with Downloaders, HF or Filesonic?

Status
Not open for further replies.

The90sKid

Active Member
305
2010
39
0
This is nothing to do with uploading, or earnings. So please leave your Uploaders $$$ Mindset out the door.

It's got to do with downloaders. I don't use neither so i have no clue.

Which one is more popular with Downloaders??
 
17 comments
FileServe gave me 60kbps download speed
Hotfile gave me 100kbps download speed
Rapidshare gave me 230kbps download speed

All as free users.

So RapidShare for the win :)
 
@sasacal, Yep.

Downloaders prefer hotfile. THe premium service of fso sucks (based on my own experiences), some of ur downloads would just stop and can't be resumed -_-

I've always got more downloads in hotfile. I myself prefer hotfile as well. :|
 
FileServe gave me 60kbps download speed
Hotfile gave me 100kbps download speed
Rapidshare gave me 230kbps download speed

All as free users.

So RapidShare for the win :)

DID YOU SEE THE FUCKING OP? IT SAID H-O-T-F-I-L-E OR F-I-L-E-S-O-N-I-C. NOT RAPIDSHARE.
 
Filesonic is more popular as for downloaders because
If you go on any warez forum/blog you'll find more FSC links more than HF's
 
I rather use Hotfile instead of FileSonic to be honest. Off topic, for free user I'd use MegaUpload or MediaFire. For premium I'd go with RapidShare or FileServe ;)... My experience as a mega downloader. I been downloading very large amounts of files every day for the last 6 or 7 years. Take it from me ;)
 
DID YOU SEE THE FUCKING OP? IT SAID H-O-T-F-I-L-E OR F-I-L-E-S-O-N-I-C. NOT RAPIDSHARE.

I SAW THE FUCKING POST. I EVEN WROTE WHAT WOULD I PREFER !!!!

AS A DOWNLOADER, HOTFILE & FILESONIC BOTH SUCKS. SO I POINTED OUT MY OPINIONS AS THE THREAD DOESN'T PUT RESTRICTIONS FOR "ONLY HF & FSC"! YOU MUST BE EITHER MENTALLY RETARDED OR YOU WERE BORN LIKE THAT.

SUCKS TO BE YOU.

[SLIDE]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20081022010108/uncyclopedia/images/5/56/YouSuck.jpg[/SLIDE]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top