Hi,
I have noticed a few hosts here who have a found a way to bypass, the WJunction rule on No nulled copies for Whmcs, their is a few loopholes i have noticed and i think the loopholes should be closed, i did not really want to mention specific hosts here but i feel its neccassary to illustrate my point effectively, if i dont have proof this post is just useless hear say, which makes it pointless, so if you host is mentioned it is nothing personal and in truth the likely hood is i have never used your host, before anyone says it yes their is plenty of safe whmcs nulled copies, but how do you know your copy is safe unless you nulled it yourself but if you where a licenced host why use a nulled copy so i think its fair to assume most hosts did not null it themselves.
1) Using a subdomain of a licenced host, an example is PreWebHosts.info, they use http://order.prewebhosts.mywarezhost.info/ for the billing system, specifically becuase Mywarezhost.info has a licence, so they are able to post here becuase the licence check says yes MyWarezHost is licenced, but running a licence debug PreWebHosts, confirms it is a strong likely hood they are using a nulled copy with the License Key outputting 00000000000. (feel free to go to http://order.prewebhosts.mywarezhost.info/cart.php?licensedebug youself, it will confirm or see the print screen below) to me this is a violation of the no nulled rule as they are using nulled despite giving the appearance they are using a licenced copy.
2) Hosts owning a licence but using a nulled copy, your guess is as good as mine as to why, if you asked me to hazard a guess i would say they have a branded licence but want non-branded, an Example for this is "warez-host.com", in the whmcs it says they are authorised to use it but running a licence debug confirms some Anomalies, such as the licence appearently being owned, but yet saying "Free Account" under billing cycle. Check (http://clients.warez-host.com/cart.php?licensedebug), if you dont believe me compare Sadino's licence (https://www.my365host.com/clients/cart.php?licensedebug) with this one (http://clients.warez-host.com/cart.php?licensedebug), why did i pick Sadino to demonstate the diffrence simple i remember reading a post where he said he had brought an owned licence, and the info in his atleast makes sence.
As you have banned Nulled Licences, i think it should apply to everyone aswell as hosts who have found ways to hide it like in the above examples.
Thanks for reading and again i have nothing against any of the hosts above i have not used them so i cannot comment on their integrity, and to be honest the example hosts where just random hosts i found using nulled, if it had of been a few hours later to be honest it may have been diffrent hosts used in the above examples.
Thanks
Delboy
I have noticed a few hosts here who have a found a way to bypass, the WJunction rule on No nulled copies for Whmcs, their is a few loopholes i have noticed and i think the loopholes should be closed, i did not really want to mention specific hosts here but i feel its neccassary to illustrate my point effectively, if i dont have proof this post is just useless hear say, which makes it pointless, so if you host is mentioned it is nothing personal and in truth the likely hood is i have never used your host, before anyone says it yes their is plenty of safe whmcs nulled copies, but how do you know your copy is safe unless you nulled it yourself but if you where a licenced host why use a nulled copy so i think its fair to assume most hosts did not null it themselves.
1) Using a subdomain of a licenced host, an example is PreWebHosts.info, they use http://order.prewebhosts.mywarezhost.info/ for the billing system, specifically becuase Mywarezhost.info has a licence, so they are able to post here becuase the licence check says yes MyWarezHost is licenced, but running a licence debug PreWebHosts, confirms it is a strong likely hood they are using a nulled copy with the License Key outputting 00000000000. (feel free to go to http://order.prewebhosts.mywarezhost.info/cart.php?licensedebug youself, it will confirm or see the print screen below) to me this is a violation of the no nulled rule as they are using nulled despite giving the appearance they are using a licenced copy.
2) Hosts owning a licence but using a nulled copy, your guess is as good as mine as to why, if you asked me to hazard a guess i would say they have a branded licence but want non-branded, an Example for this is "warez-host.com", in the whmcs it says they are authorised to use it but running a licence debug confirms some Anomalies, such as the licence appearently being owned, but yet saying "Free Account" under billing cycle. Check (http://clients.warez-host.com/cart.php?licensedebug), if you dont believe me compare Sadino's licence (https://www.my365host.com/clients/cart.php?licensedebug) with this one (http://clients.warez-host.com/cart.php?licensedebug), why did i pick Sadino to demonstate the diffrence simple i remember reading a post where he said he had brought an owned licence, and the info in his atleast makes sence.
As you have banned Nulled Licences, i think it should apply to everyone aswell as hosts who have found ways to hide it like in the above examples.
Thanks for reading and again i have nothing against any of the hosts above i have not used them so i cannot comment on their integrity, and to be honest the example hosts where just random hosts i found using nulled, if it had of been a few hours later to be honest it may have been diffrent hosts used in the above examples.
Thanks
Delboy
