Kaspersky Vs Symantec Norton Antivirus

Status
Not open for further replies.

mourya

Banned
Banned
123
2009
3
0
Which is the best antivirus do you think?

Kaspersky --- > Why ?

Norton ----- > why ?

I used both i vote for kaspersky Internet security 2010 as it uses less resources. KAV detects more viruses than the other or is saying that it detected.

NAV is resource hungry which slows up your pc. Less detection . Huge updates.

Post your experiences. =)=)
 
19 comments
Used Kaspersky ... computer got infected after 2 weeks

Used Norton ... PC almost died because of the resources

Conclusion : Use Ubuntu <_<
 
nod32 with daily update is best. i used kaspersky, norton, panda,macaffee etc all those failed. nod32 less resource hog,detects newer virus too
 
simple ...avira :) less resources beasty detection and doesnt lag the comp but it gives a lot of false positives
^^ pretty much what i was gonna say.

Norton - you're better off using no antivirus at all
Kaspersky - good detection rate, but be prepared to pay for it.
 
I hate programs running in my background, but if anything I'd use Kaspersky.

Currently if I feel suspicious about a file, I use this site:

Code:
http://virusscan.jotti.org/en
 
I have used everything, NOD32, Norton, Windows Live One Care, AVG, etc.

Windows Live One Care catches almost everything, although you have to pay a good chunk of cash for it, I have NEVER had an infected computer...

Norton was BY far one of the worst choices I ever made.

AVG is what I use on 4 of my 7 computers. I have never had a problem when I have AVG installed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top