Images would be required on free image hosts, such as imgur.com or similar. Not on filehosts.
I dont even have to see the images, you made approx 15 different claims, and I will see only 2 images...
I bet you haven't read their TOS, before you applied... and those images are proving that...
Not to mention they are having money back guarantee, and you can request refund...
EDIT:
There's one newb here, not understanding that respecting staff on this forum is top notch priority. This includes smartass comments, disrespect, irony, sarcasm, and similar indirect insults of my intelligence. My little speech wasn't pointed to anyone in particular, but toward all negative reviews, that usually consist from competition, (assumption based on 10-15 posts I've deleted that contained a link toward some other similar service) or people who can't read what they are purchasing, before they do such thing. They also don't read that they CAN issue a refund, but trying to be persistive, and using 100GB bandwidth on some service, to determine if it's good or bad, is if nothing else, proof that one doesn't have a knowledge about the purchase. You found my comment somehow biased? Then read again what's been written here. Check how many claims you made, and how little to none proof you provided regarding all those. Btw, Zevera is not even advertising here, they registered here to reply on this topic alone.
A little guide what to do when making a review of such service.
1. When you make a claim, provide us with screenshots/proofs that support your claim.
2. Both positive and negative reviews, without proof that support claim, should be taken with grain of salt.
3. Before you decide to throw a mud on someone, read what you agreed to, read help files, if any, read TOS. This will save everyone's time.
4. Do have in mind that file hosts do everything to get rid of such services, or limit them as much as possible, from using their bandwidth.
Not one single claim in this thread is supported by any valid proof.
There seems to be general problem, that users don't read what they are paying for, what they can expect, and what not, or even take a look at refund policy.
I dont even have to see the images, you made approx 15 different claims, and I will see only 2 images...
I bet you haven't read their TOS, before you applied... and those images are proving that...
Not to mention they are having money back guarantee, and you can request refund...
If you are not satisfied with your premium account you can request a refund in the first 5 days if you haven’t downloaded more than 8 GB or more than 10 different files.
EDIT:
There's one newb here, not understanding that respecting staff on this forum is top notch priority. This includes smartass comments, disrespect, irony, sarcasm, and similar indirect insults of my intelligence. My little speech wasn't pointed to anyone in particular, but toward all negative reviews, that usually consist from competition, (assumption based on 10-15 posts I've deleted that contained a link toward some other similar service) or people who can't read what they are purchasing, before they do such thing. They also don't read that they CAN issue a refund, but trying to be persistive, and using 100GB bandwidth on some service, to determine if it's good or bad, is if nothing else, proof that one doesn't have a knowledge about the purchase. You found my comment somehow biased? Then read again what's been written here. Check how many claims you made, and how little to none proof you provided regarding all those. Btw, Zevera is not even advertising here, they registered here to reply on this topic alone.
A little guide what to do when making a review of such service.
1. When you make a claim, provide us with screenshots/proofs that support your claim.
2. Both positive and negative reviews, without proof that support claim, should be taken with grain of salt.
3. Before you decide to throw a mud on someone, read what you agreed to, read help files, if any, read TOS. This will save everyone's time.
4. Do have in mind that file hosts do everything to get rid of such services, or limit them as much as possible, from using their bandwidth.
Not one single claim in this thread is supported by any valid proof.
There seems to be general problem, that users don't read what they are paying for, what they can expect, and what not, or even take a look at refund policy.
Last edited: