Search results

Blatant lie, I told you to PM me your email or invoice ID and you would be refunded. Any need for that?

The patch was applied, All proof sent to WHMCS pending there view on this.

Or you could just PM me your username and i will refund you, Any reason not to ?

WHMCS have been contacted this again was due to WHMCS I am waiting on their reply shown them all logs, you can post what you wish, Slander us in anyway you wish, But this was not down to the lack of our security. All patches are in place that are meant to be, And if you are wondering why I'm not...

Please, Read posts before asking questions.

Drakul, If the credit has not been applied then please open a ticket so it can be applied for you :)

We have two remote backups sadly they were linked via the breached API system, Secondly, both patches were applied to WHMCS the day they were released, We understand the anger in clients right now but clients should also be backing up critical data.

Pop me a PM or pop open a ticket buddy ill clear this up for you.

Jamie, You should study a bit more mate, you cannot "manage" directors, You cannot just remove & add shares when and were you wish it all takes legal proceedings, all has to be documented. It isn't like playing monopoly.

Myself & Jamie haven't spoken in months due to the constant childishness, that is how sad it got, it was just trolling, As I said, I'll take this out of the forum and into the solicitors now you had your chances Jamie. My Skype is also posted all over the forum Craig managed to add me what was...

@Krun!x Wait a minute, So making a post clarifies who owns what ? okay.

End of the day Jamie you were offered the civil private route, you then tried to take out VPS nodes, Should I let you do that ? no, You then stated you would try to take down the company with such actions seen in the screen shots you were offered over a 8 week span many times to do this without...

Jamie, Also your added proof is old and outdated documentation. Sorry but you are just wasting my time, Expect a solicitors letter on your door step Tuesday morning.

Pretty much the full story goes like this, Jamie started sitting back letting everyone else do the work making no input was to busy getting messed up to care, got to a point were enough was enough Jamie was removed from the company as a shared holder and as a director this was done legally...

Yes i know that is why i edited sorry.

Proving that you are a scum, just trying to rip in while we have an issue already time to move on mate, ill also be posting all legal documents to you started thsi thread you handle it.

http://boxslots.com/nano/ We were 50/50 down the middle. I dealt with all legal side of registering everything Jamie sat and smoked money, oh well dirty laundry, public, fair enough.

Jamie, It's sad it's come to this, your yet again failed attempts, you are not a shareholder, you are not a director.

Jamie you was removed legally for being a 19 year old no good for nothing drug addicted child, You tried to black mail me with threatening to destroy all nodes unless you got X amount of cash, then you continued to do so by stealing and so forth, Hey tell you what bud, Why dont we go the whole 9...

Jamie, Very fun post, shame it's 90% lies. If you wish i will post all legal documentation to prove what the actual story is.