Latest Announcemnent
New thread
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

Edward

Active Member
472
2011
41
0
Hi, I'm thinking of switch from Filesonic to Netload, but first I'd like to know what's your idea about this hoster, what's your experience with Netload ? It provides good speed for free users ? It counts every completed download also for premium users ? Let me know your attitude. Thanks :)<3
 
28 comments
I found FSC to be better than Netload. I used to get better downloads with FSC when I put both these links together.

Try it for a week and check the results, see if you are satisfied. If you are not, then revert back to FSC.

But overall, I think, downloaders prefer FSC over Netload.
 
Netload is the best PPD host for me, the most stable, fast (Downloading/Uploading) and profitable (They count multiple points even if you are premium) The bad thing is you cant upload files larger than 400MB (A big fail if you like to share with 500MB/1GB/2GB links)
 
I've just see that Netload doesn't have captchas, this is very appreciated by downloaders...for this reason I don't think that the 400mb limit it's a really big problem because without captchas people can download more quietly and they don't care about how many files they have to download....am I wrong ?
 
PerMaFrOsT said:
They dont have captchas and fast download speed for freebies, the big problem is waiting time.
Click to expand...
Waiting time....maybe, but if you think that you can queue a lots of file without captchas problem I think that people appreciate that a lot, it's like megaupload : you can queue a lots of file and than do other things without having to enter codes for every single download and it's because of this that people love megaupload...

P.S. Also Filesonic has waiting time....
 
Edward said:
Waiting time....maybe, but if you think that you can queue a lots of file without captchas problem I think that people appreciate that a lot, it's like megaupload : you can queue a lots of file and than do other things without having to enter codes for every single download and it's because of this that people love megaupload...

P.S. Also Filesonic has waiting time....
Click to expand...
I would like to test if they put 60mins waiting time per 100MB/Hour or if size part isnt important, not same:

100MB Download + Waiting time 1h for start the next part
than
400MB Download + Waiting time 4h for start the next part

Anyway as you said, is really good for lazy freebie downloaders because they can put the files in queue during night or day and doing nothing they have the content, my problem is i mainly share big files (+5GB) so this queues are eternal and usually leechers ask for Rapidshare or Megaupload without giving you thanks first for the upload effort :(
 
PerMaFrOsT said:
I would like to test if they put 60mins waiting time per 100MB/Hour or if size part isnt important, not same:

100MB Download + Waiting time 1h for start the next part
than
400MB Download + Waiting time 4h for start the next part

Anyway as you said, is really good for lazy freebie downloaders because they can put the files in queue during night or day and doing nothing they have the content, my problem is i mainly share big files (+5GB) so this queues are eternal and usually leechers ask for Rapidshare or Megaupload without giving you thanks first for the upload effort :(
Click to expand...
Jdownloader which is the most popular download manager has the possibility to change Ip automatically in these case, so there isn't 1hr waiting time between files...simple free downloaders just change ip and download the next file and jdownloader does all by itself :)
 
I've just compared Filesonic free download speed vs Netload free download speed and the winner is :

1) Filesonic = 250/300 Kb/s :sun:<3
2) Netload = 20/50 Kb/s :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

I think that Netload doesn't have any chance to get my preference, I would have check free download speed before open this topic...:P
 
Edward said:
I've just compared Filesonic free download speed vs Netload free download speed and the winner is :

1) Filesonic = 250/300 Kb/s :sun:<3
2) Netload = 20/50 Kb/s :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

I think that Netload doesn't have any chance to get my preference, I would have check free download speed before open this topic...:P
Click to expand...

I use Netload since years and if you cant reach more than 50KB/s it´s because the server who locate the file is busy with other premium downloads, Netload usually hold DL speed for freebies during peak hours of the day. I dont care about that because i often use MU as mirror for those who cant pay for premium

Anyway if your users dont blame you for type captcha, they can download much more faster from FileSonic or FileServe as you said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top