RapidShare Publishes Anti-Piracy Manifesto for Cyberlockers - WJunction

ShareShiz · 19th Apr 2012, 03:23 PM

RapidShare Publishes Anti-Piracy Manifesto for Cyberlockers
By Ernesto

Swiss-based file-hosting service RapidShare has released an anti-piracy manifesto to serve as a guideline for cyberlocker and cloud hosting sites. Partly motivated by the criminal indictment of Megaupload, RapidShare stresses that they will do all they can to counter piracy, even if this is at the expense of user privacy and convenience.

Quote:

In the aftermath of the Megaupload shutdown, people have been keeping a close eye on other file-hosting services, RapidShare included.

As a company, RapidShare sees itself operating in the “cloud hosting” business, offering a service comparable to the likes of Dropbox. And since people are moving data from local drives to the cloud at an increasing rate, these companies will undoubtedly host some copyrighted material too.

During the past several years RapidShare has made tremendous efforts to cooperate with copyright holders and limit copyright infringements. The Swiss-based company is trying to position itself as a front-runner when it comes to responsible dealings with copyright infringers.

Emphasizing this role, the cyberlocker has just published an anti-piracy manifesto for cyberlockers, or a “responsible practices for cloud storage services” as they call it.

“RapidShare has always embraced our obligation to protect the intellectual property and copyright interests of creators. Today’s announcement takes that obligation to a new level,” said RapidShare’s general counsel Daniel Raimer commenting on the release.

The four page document is a summary of what RapidShare believes cyberlockers should do to assist copyright holders in preventing copyright infringements. While some of the suggestions are already baked into the US DMCA, several of the suggestions go above and beyond existing law, with inevitable consequences for the privacy of users.

It includes basic recommendations such as making files private by default, but it also goes further by granting copyright holders the power to get account holders disconnected when they are merely suspected of copyright infringement.

Quote:

“Services should terminate account holders or subscribers not merely upon proof that they are infringers but when sufficient copyright holders have called their conduct into question,” RapidShare writes. Or in other words, account holders are guilty until proven innocent.

In addition, RapidShare also makes it mandatory for account holders to use valid email addresses, so these can be shared with copyright holders when there’s a legal dispute.

Quote:

“Services should require valid e-mail addresses of subscribers and account holders in order for them to register new accounts. In the event a copyright holder seeks account holder information through valid legal procedures, the service should have access to valid e-mail address information to furnish in response, which may facilitate an inquiry to the e-mail service provider. “

The above is bad news for privacy loving anons, but there are more concerns on this front. RapidShare also suggests that all cyberlockers update their privacy policy to make it possible for them to inspect the personal files of those who are accused of copyright infringement.

Quote:

“Privacy policies should establish that service providers retain the right to inspect files of repeat accused infringers or accused violators of the service’s terms of service who, after reasonable notice to them by the service provider, have made no good-faith counter notifications or efforts to justify their conduct as non-infringing or as not violating the service provider’s terms of service.”

Also, RapidShare recommends that cyberlockers operate from countries that respect copyright law.

Quote:

“Service providers should either reside in a country that belongs to the Hague Convention for the Service of Process Abroad or should voluntarily comply with requests to waive service of process with respect to subpoenas for user information. They should also reside in a jurisdiction that shows respect for copyright law.”

In his announcement of the manifesto Raimer once again emphasized that his company is doing all it can to eradicate piracy.

“We want all stakeholders in the debate over online copyright infringement [...] to understand that RapidShare recognizes that piracy is a serious problem, that we’re reinforcing our efforts to eradicate it, and that we’re calling on other data logistics companies to do the same,” he said.

The company itself goes even beyond its own recommendations, by monitoring third-party sites and forums that post links to infringing material on RapidShare. In addition, the cyberlocker also decreased the download speeds of free users to drive pirates away.

Thus far the entertainment industry is quite content with RapidShare’s efforts, but whether the average RapidShare user is happy with these changes is doubtful.

Read the Full Manifesto Here

JGM · 19th Apr 2012, 08:51 PM

It will because of this new manefesto that you will see a huge decline in the number of people who use your service legal or otherwise. If you do not respect the privacy of people files among other things then why the hell should anybody pay to use your service.

Another stupid idea brought to you by Rapidshare.

JGM.

ShareShiz · 19th Apr 2012, 08:54 PM

I could not agree more. The reason why I use filehosts/cloud services is for privacy. If you ain't gonna give me privacy I might as well just get my own server.

Jiung · 19th Apr 2012, 09:02 PM

let me call this "grey" opportunity from RS, they want all user keep using RS whatever the content, in other side they wanna keep "clean" from cyberlockers. money talks here..

mintcold · 19th Apr 2012, 09:51 PM

Ok , this MAY be right in the States , but Rapid-dick is based in Switzerland , and the laws their apply to them .. I don't think The Law in Switzerland allows users personal info to be shared without a court order ..

Lifetalk · 19th Apr 2012, 09:57 PM

Classic example where Rapidshare sucks the 'copyright holders'' cock to save itself. Megaupload might have gone down, but they did it with respect. Rapidshare, on the other hand, is just about anyone's bitch when it comes to saving ass.

Smith · 19th Apr 2012, 10:49 PM

"Rapidshare bends over and takes it like a little slut."

examan345 · 19th Apr 2012, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JGM

It will because of this new manefesto that you will see a huge decline in the number of people who use your service legal or otherwise. If you do not respect the privacy of people files among other things then why the hell should anybody pay to use your service.

Another stupid idea brought to you by Rapidshare.

JGM.

i think they would rather lose half of their users than risk getting shut down like megaupload

JGM · 19th Apr 2012, 11:25 PM

I think they will lose more than half... a lot more.

JGM.

SJshah · 19th Apr 2012, 11:36 PM

They're in a loose-loose situation with anything they do right now. They're making the right move when looking at it from their point of view. Compromising on user privacy will keep them alive, wheras doing nothing will only lead to worse things for Rapidshare.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FSC All-Star Anti-Piracy PSA	Daniel	General Discussion	16	20th Aug 2011 12:04 PM
Anti-Piracy or Pro-Piracy?	thecompgame	Polling Plaza	13	14th Jul 2011 10:21 AM
Will Google Be Forced into Anti-Piracy?	Daniel	News & Current Events	1	15th Mar 2011 05:54 PM
How ‘Cyberlockers’ Became The Biggest Problem In Piracy	Daniel	News & Current Events	1	20th Jan 2011 02:13 PM

19th Apr 2012, 08:51 PM	#2
JGM My Statistics Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,114 Liked: 346 Times Rep Power: 10	It will because of this new manefesto that you will see a huge decline in the number of people who use your service legal or otherwise. If you do not respect the privacy of people files among other things then why the hell should anybody pay to use your service. Another stupid idea brought to you by Rapidshare. JGM.
	Quote

19th Apr 2012, 08:54 PM	#3
ShareShiz Banned Website(s): ihide.info My Statistics Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 2,901 Liked: 1,210 Times Rep Power: 0	I could not agree more. The reason why I use filehosts/cloud services is for privacy. If you ain't gonna give me privacy I might as well just get my own server.
	Quote

19th Apr 2012, 09:02 PM	#4
Jiung My Statistics Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 200 Liked: 15 Times Rep Power: 2	let me call this "grey" opportunity from RS, they want all user keep using RS whatever the content, in other side they wanna keep "clean" from cyberlockers. money talks here..
	Quote

19th Apr 2012, 09:51 PM	#5
mintcold My Statistics Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 272 Liked: 86 Times Rep Power: 2	Ok , this MAY be right in the States , but Rapid-dick is based in Switzerland , and the laws their apply to them .. I don't think The Law in Switzerland allows users personal info to be shared without a court order ..
	Quote

19th Apr 2012, 09:57 PM	#6
Lifetalk My Statistics Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 4,353 Liked: 1,952 Times Rep Power: 29	Classic example where Rapidshare sucks the 'copyright holders'' cock to save itself. Megaupload might have gone down, but they did it with respect. Rapidshare, on the other hand, is just about anyone's bitch when it comes to saving ass.
	Quote

19th Apr 2012, 10:49 PM	#7
Smith My Statistics Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 1,984 Liked: 560 Times Rep Power: 11	"Rapidshare bends over and takes it like a little slut."
	Quote

19th Apr 2012, 11:25 PM	#9
JGM My Statistics Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,114 Liked: 346 Times Rep Power: 10	I think they will lose more than half... a lot more. JGM.
	Quote

19th Apr 2012, 11:36 PM	#10
SJshah My Statistics Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 2,587 Liked: 155 Times Rep Power: 7	They're in a loose-loose situation with anything they do right now. They're making the right move when looking at it from their point of view. Compromising on user privacy will keep them alive, wheras doing nothing will only lead to worse things for Rapidshare.
	Quote